[What does the Internet teach the obstetric patient about labor analgesia?]
Autor: | Weiss MA; Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Faculdade de Medicina, São Paulo, SP, Brasil. Electronic address: marianaweiss74@gmail.com., Sochio Junior LD; Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Faculdade de Medicina, São Paulo, SP, Brasil., Bliacheriene F; Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Faculdade de Medicina, Anestesia Obstétrica, São Paulo, SP, Brasil., Murphy C; University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Obstetric Anesthesia, Toronto, Canadá., Chinappa V; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canadá; University of Toronto, Department of Anesthesia, Toronto, Canadá., Carmona MJ; Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Faculdade de Medicina, Disciplina de Anestesiologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil., Margarido CB; University of Toronto, Department of Anesthesia, Toronto, Canadá; University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canadá. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | portugalština |
Zdroj: | Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier) [Braz J Anesthesiol] 2018 May - Jun; Vol. 68 (3), pp. 254-259. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Mar 07. |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.bjan.2017.12.003 |
Abstrakt: | Background and Objectives: It has been observed a general public increased search on the Internet for health information, including Anesthesiology. The objective of this study was to evaluate the information available to the lay person in Portuguese on the internet about labor analgesia for the Brazilian population. Method: Using the term "labor anesthesia", the first 20 sites found on Google in November 2014 were evaluated by two resident physicians and classified as medical and non-medical. Legibility and Design - accessibility, reliability and navigability-were compared using Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRESH) and Minervation validation tool for healthcare websites (LIDA) tools. The websites' content was confronted with that of the medical literature. Results: Medical and non-medical websites were considered difficult to read according to FRESH. Regarding the design, there was no difference between groups regarding navigability, however, accessibility was considered superior in non-medical websites (p = 0.042); while reliability was higher in medical websites (p = 0.019). Conclusions: With the increased search for health information on the Internet and concern about improving the quality of childbirth care, it is fundamental that the content available to the layperson about labor analgesia is of quality and well understood. This study demonstrated that both medical and non-medical websites are difficult to read and that non-medical websites are more accessible while the medical ones are more accurate. (Copyright © 2018 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Publicado por Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |