| Autor: |
Fujiwara MT; Department of Materials and Life Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Sophia University, Chiyoda, Tokyo, Japan.; Nishina Center and Plant Functions Laboratory, RIKEN, Wako, Saitama, Japan., Yasuzawa M; Department of Materials and Life Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Sophia University, Chiyoda, Tokyo, Japan., Kojo KH; Department of Materials and Life Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Sophia University, Chiyoda, Tokyo, Japan., Niwa Y; Laboratory of Plant Molecular Improvement, Graduate School of Nutritional and Environmental Sciences, University of Shizuoka, Suruga, Shizuoka, Japan., Abe T; Nishina Center and Plant Functions Laboratory, RIKEN, Wako, Saitama, Japan., Yoshida S; Nishina Center and Plant Functions Laboratory, RIKEN, Wako, Saitama, Japan., Nakano T; Gene Discovery Research Group, Center for Sustainable Resource Science, RIKEN, Wako, Saitama, Japan.; CREST, JST (Japan Science and Technology Agency), Kawaguchi, Saitama, Japan., Itoh RD; Department of Chemistry, Biology and Marine Science, Faculty of Science, University of the Ryukyus, Nishihara, Okinawa, Japan. |
| Abstrakt: |
Chloroplasts, or photosynthetic plastids, multiply by binary fission, forming a homogeneous population in plant cells. In Arabidopsis thaliana, the division apparatus (or division ring) of mesophyll chloroplasts includes an inner envelope transmembrane protein ARC6, a cytoplasmic dynamin-related protein ARC5 (DRP5B), and members of the FtsZ1 and FtsZ2 families of proteins, which co-assemble in the stromal mid-plastid division ring (FtsZ ring). FtsZ ring placement is controlled by several proteins, including a stromal factor MinE (AtMinE1). During leaf mesophyll development, ARC6 and AtMinE1 are necessary for FtsZ ring formation and thus plastid division initiation, while ARC5 is essential for a later stage of plastid division. Here, we examined plastid morphology in leaf epidermal pavement cells (PCs) and stomatal guard cells (GCs) in the arc5 and arc6 mutants using stroma-targeted fluorescent proteins. The arc5 PC plastids were generally a bit larger than those of the wild type, but most had normal shapes and were division-competent, unlike mutant mesophyll chloroplasts. The arc6 PC plastids were heterogeneous in size and shape, including the formation of giant and mini-plastids, plastids with highly developed stromules, and grape-like plastid clusters, which varied on a cell-by-cell basis. Moreover, unique plastid phenotypes for stomatal GCs were observed in both mutants. The arc5 GCs rarely lacked chlorophyll-bearing plastids (chloroplasts), while they accumulated minute chlorophyll-less plastids, whereas most GCs developed wild type-like chloroplasts. The arc6 GCs produced large chloroplasts and/or chlorophyll-less plastids, as previously observed, but unexpectedly, their chloroplasts/plastids exhibited marked morphological variations. We quantitatively analyzed plastid morphology and partitioning in paired GCs from wild-type, arc5, arc6, and atminE1 plants. Collectively, our results support the notion that ARC5 is dispensable in the process of equal division of epidermal plastids, and indicate that dysfunctions in ARC5 and ARC6 differentially affect plastid replication among mesophyll cells, PCs, and GCs within a single leaf. |
