| Autor: |
Kotarsky CJ; Muscle, Metabolism, and Ergogenics Laboratory, Department of Health, Nutrition, and Exercise Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota., Christensen BK; Muscle, Metabolism, and Ergogenics Laboratory, Department of Health, Nutrition, and Exercise Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota., Miller JS; Department of Athletics, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota., Hackney KJ; Muscle, Metabolism, and Ergogenics Laboratory, Department of Health, Nutrition, and Exercise Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota. |
| Abstrakt: |
Kotarsky, CJ, Christensen, BK, Miller, JS, and Hackney, KJ. Effect of progressive calisthenic push-up training on muscle strength and thickness. J Strength Cond Res 32(3): 651-659, 2018-Calisthenics, a form of resistance training, continue to increase in popularity; however, few studies have examined their effectiveness for muscle strength improvement. The purpose of this study was to determine whether progressive calisthenic push-up training (PUSH) is comparable with traditional bench press training (BENCH) as a technique for increasing muscle strength and thickness. Twenty-three healthy, moderately trained men (mean ± SD: age 23 ± 6.8 years) completed the study. Subjects were randomly assigned to PUSH (n = 14) and BENCH (n = 9) groups and were trained 3 days per week for 4 weeks. Muscle thickness (MT), seated medicine ball put (MBP), 1 repetition maximum (1RM) bench press, and push-up progression (PUP) were measured before and after training. Results revealed significant increases in 1RM (p < 0.001) and PUP (p < 0.001) for both groups after training. The increase in PUP was significantly greater for PUSH (p < 0.001). No significant differences were found within groups for MT and MBP (p > 0.05). This study is the first to demonstrate that calisthenics, using different progressive variations to maintain strength training programming variables, can improve upper-body muscle strength. |
