Greater Compliance within Instruction for Use for Concomitant Iliac Aneurysms and Adverse Aneurysm Characteristics-Initial Experience with the Nellix Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing System at a Single Institution.

Autor:	Jeffrey Hing JX; Department of General Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore. Electronic address: junxian.hing@mohh.com.sg., Ch'ng JK; Department of Vascular Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore., Tay KH; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore., Chong TT; Department of Vascular Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Annals of vascular surgery [Ann Vasc Surg] 2018 May; Vol. 49, pp. 144-151. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Feb 09.
DOI:	10.1016/j.avsg.2018.01.063
Abstrakt:	Background: The Nellix was introduced to Asia in 2014. Data in Asians have been sparse. Two balloon-expandable stents, each surrounded by a polymer-filled endobag, are deployed in parallel to obliterate and seal the aneurysm. This paradigm shift to treating abdominal aortic aneurysms confers advantages for certain adverse aneurysm morphology that is outside the instruction-for-use (IFU) for standard endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) devices. We examine outcomes of 15 Asian patients with concomitant infrarenal aortic and iliac artery aneurysms treated with the Nellix at our institution. Method: Between July 2014 and August 2016, 15 male patients underwent elective EVAS at a single tertiary center by the same team of vascular surgeons and interventional radiologists. Patient demographics, clinical presentations, aneurysm morphology, perioperative complications, and follow-up imaging according to the standardized protocol were studied. Preoperative CT images were analyzed using validated automatic 3-dimensional sizing software EndoSize. Result: The novel stent-graft deployment proves consistent and achieved a 100% technical success. Eleven patients (70%) complied within specified Nellix IFU, as compared to 20% if standard endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) IFU was applied. The difference is due to the presence of concurrent common iliac aneurysms (n = 5), short neck length (n = 3), and angulated necks (n = 3). Adjunct procedures included 3 open access endarterectomy with embolectomy, 1 coil embolization of internal iliac artery, 1 bilateral renal artery chimneys, and 1 proximal stent deployment. There was no conversion to open surgery. Average operative time was 133 min. Median length of stay was 4 days. Thirty-day mortality was 0%. Perioperative morbidity included exacerbation of pre-existing renal impairment (n = 6), peripheral vascular disease (n = 3), and postimplantation syndrome (n = 5). One endoleak (7%) and 2 instances of stent migration (14%) were detected. There was no complication of aneurysm or endobag rupture, limb thromboses, or fracture. Conclusions: Early data in our center are encouraging and highlight high procedural success with minimal complications despite challenging patient anatomy. (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu