Comparing mail-in self-collected specimens sent via United States Postal Service versus clinic-collected specimens for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in extra-genital sites.

Autor: Salow KR; Public Health Division, AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Los Angeles, California, United States of America., Cohen AC; Public Health Division, AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Los Angeles, California, United States of America., Bristow CC; Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America., McGrath MR; Public Health Division, AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Los Angeles, California, United States of America., Klausner JD; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.; Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: PloS one [PLoS One] 2017 Dec 14; Vol. 12 (12), pp. e0189515. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Dec 14 (Print Publication: 2017).
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189515
Abstrakt: Objectives: To evaluate the concordance between clinic-collected extra-genital specimens and self-collected mailed-in extra-genital specimens among participants seeking sexually transmitted infection testing at a free clinic in Hollywood, CA.
Methods: A convenience sample of 210 men who have sex with men were enrolled between February 29, 2016 and December 21, 2016 and received mail-in testing kits for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG). All testing was performed using the GeneXpert® CT/NG (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA).
Results: From the 210 mail-in kits distributed, 149 mail-in kits (71.0%) were returned to the laboratory, resulting in 145 pairs (clinic-collected and mail-in) of rectal test results and 148 pairs of pharyngeal test results for both CT and NG detection. The concordance was 95.0% for all CT rectal tests, 99.3% for all CT pharyngeal tests, 95.7% for all NG rectal tests, and 97.2% for all NG pharyngeal tests.
Conclusion: Roughly two-thirds of mail-in test kits were returned and concordance was generally high, however more than one-third of positive results were missed in mail-in samples. The prevalence of potential false-negative results among mail-in samples warrants caution when implementing mail-in STI testing strategies.
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: