Post-operative Refractive Prediction Error After Phacovitrectomy: A Retrospective Study.

Autor: Hötte GJ; Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. g.j.hotte@erasmusmc.nl., de Bruyn DP; Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands., de Hoog J; Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Ophthalmology and therapy [Ophthalmol Ther] 2018 Jun; Vol. 7 (1), pp. 83-94. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Dec 13.
DOI: 10.1007/s40123-017-0116-4
Abstrakt: Introduction: Many authors have reported on a myopic post-operative refractive prediction error when combining phacoemulsification with pars plana vitrectomy (phacovitrectomy). In this study we evaluate the amount of this error in our facility and try to elucidate the various factors involved.
Methods: This was a retrospective study which included 140 patients who underwent phacovitrectomy (39 with macular holes, 88 with puckers, and 13 with floaters). Post-operative refractive error was defined as the difference between the actual spherical equivalent (SEQ) and expected SEQ based on the SRK/T and Holladay-II formulas. Both univariate (paired t test, independent t test, one-way analysis of variance, or Mann-Whitney test) and multivariate (regression analysis) statistical analyses were performed.
Results: Overall, a refractive error of - 0.13 dpt (p = 0.033) and - 0.26 dpt (p < 0.01) were found in the SRK/T and Holladay-II formulas, respectively. For the independent diagnoses, only macular holes showed a myopic error with the SRK/T (- 0.31 dpt; p < 0.01) and Holladay-II (- 0.44 dpt; p < 0.01) formulas. In univariate analysis, significant factors involved in myopic refractive error were macular hole as diagnosis (p < 0.01 for SRK/T and Holladay-II), gas tamponade (SRK/T p = 0.024; Holladay-II p = 0.025), pre-operative myopia (p < 0.01 for SRK/T), and optical technique for axial length measurement (SRK/T and Holladay-II p < 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, pre-operative axial length (p = 0.026), optical technique for axial length measurement (p < 0.01), and pre-operative SEQ (p < 0.01) were independent predictors for myopic refractive error in the SRK/T formula. For the Holladay-II formula, optical technique for axial length measurement (p < 0.01) and pre-operative SEQ (p = 0.04) were predictive.
Conclusion: Various factors are involved in determining the myopic refractive error after phacovitrectomy. Not every factor seems to be as important in each individual patient, suggesting a more tailored approach is warranted to overcome this problem.
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje