What is the optimal duration of human chorionic gonadotrophin surveillance following evacuation of a molar pregnancy? A retrospective analysis on over 20,000 consecutive patients.

Autor: Coyle C; Department of Cancer Medicine, Charing Cross Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Centre, Charing Cross Hospital Campus of Imperial College London, London W6 8RF, United Kingdom., Short D; Department of Cancer Medicine, Charing Cross Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Centre, Charing Cross Hospital Campus of Imperial College London, London W6 8RF, United Kingdom., Jackson L; Department of Cancer Medicine, Charing Cross Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Centre, Charing Cross Hospital Campus of Imperial College London, London W6 8RF, United Kingdom., Sebire NJ; Department of Cancer Medicine, Charing Cross Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Centre, Charing Cross Hospital Campus of Imperial College London, London W6 8RF, United Kingdom., Kaur B; Department of Cancer Medicine, Charing Cross Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Centre, Charing Cross Hospital Campus of Imperial College London, London W6 8RF, United Kingdom., Harvey R; Department of Cancer Medicine, Charing Cross Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Centre, Charing Cross Hospital Campus of Imperial College London, London W6 8RF, United Kingdom., Savage PM; Department of Cancer Medicine, Charing Cross Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Centre, Charing Cross Hospital Campus of Imperial College London, London W6 8RF, United Kingdom., Seckl MJ; Department of Cancer Medicine, Charing Cross Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Centre, Charing Cross Hospital Campus of Imperial College London, London W6 8RF, United Kingdom. Electronic address: m.seckl@imperial.ac.uk.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Gynecologic oncology [Gynecol Oncol] 2018 Feb; Vol. 148 (2), pp. 254-257. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Dec 09.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.12.008
Abstrakt: Objective: To quantify the risk of developing post-molar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (pGTN) beyond the first normal human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) in women who have had a complete (CHM) or partial molar pregnancy (PHM) and to re-evaluate the current UK Hydatidiform mole hCG surveillance guidelines.
Methods: The Charing Cross Hospital Trophoblast Disease Centre database was screened to identify all registered cases of hydatidiform mole (HM) between 1980 and 2009.
Results: We identified 20,144 cases of HM, comprising 8400 CHM, 9586 PHM, and 2158 cases of unclassified hydatidiform mole (UHM). Twenty-nine cases (20 CHM, 3 PHM and 6 UHM) developed pGTN after the first normal hCG. For CHM the risk of pGTN at the point of hCG normalisation was 1 in 406, and fell rapidly in the first six months of monitoring. For PHM the risk of pGTN at the point of hCG normalisation was 1 in 3195. Women with CHM where hCG normalisation occurred beyond 56days after uterine evacuation of molar tissue were found to have a 3.8-fold higher risk of pGTN.
Conclusions: Our results show that pGTN can occur after hCG normalisation following PHM but the risk is extremely low. Women with CHM have a comparatively higher risk of pGTN after hCG normalisation. Those with CHM where hCG normalises within 56days have a lower risk of pGTN. We have revised the current UK hCG surveillance protocol for PHM to a single additional confirmatory normal urine hCG measurement one month after first normalisation. The protocol for CHM remains unchanged.
(Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE