Long-Face Dentofacial Deformities: Occlusion and Facial Esthetic Surgical Outcomes.

Autor: Posnick JC; Director, Posnick Center for Facial Plastic Surgery, Chevy Chase, MD; Clinical Professor of Surgery and Pediatrics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Clinical Professor of Orthodontics, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, MD; Adjunct Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Howard College of Dentistry, Washington, DC. Electronic address: jposnick@drposnick.com., Liu S; Former Chief Resident, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Howard College of Dentistry, Washington, DC., Tremont TJ; Associate Professor and Chair, Department of Orthodontics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons [J Oral Maxillofac Surg] 2018 Jun; Vol. 76 (6), pp. 1291-1308. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Dec 06.
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.11.006
Abstrakt: Purpose: The purpose of this study was to document malocclusion and facial dysmorphology in a series of patients with long face (LF) and chronic obstructive nasal breathing before treatment and the outcomes after bimaxillary orthognathic, osseous genioplasty, and intranasal surgery.
Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients with LF undergoing bimaxillary, chin, and intranasal (septoplasty and inferior turbinate reduction) surgery was implemented. Predictor variables were grouped into demographic, anatomic, operative, and longitudinal follow-up categories. Primary outcome variables were the initial postoperative occlusion achieved (T 2 ; 5 weeks after surgery) and the occulsion maintained long-term (>2 years after surgery). Six key occlusion parameters were assessed: overjet, overbite, coincidence of dental midlines, canine Angle classification, and molar vertical and transverse positions. The second outcome variable was the facial esthetic results. Photographs in 6 views were analyzed to document 7 facial contour characteristics.
Results: Seventy-eight patients met the inclusion criteria. Average age at surgery was 24 years (range, 13 to 54 yr). The study included 53 female patients (68%). Findings confirmed that occlusion after initial surgical healing (T 2 ) met the objectives for all parameters in 97% of patients (76 of 78). Most (68 of 78; 87%) maintained a favorable anterior and posterior occlusion for each parameter studied long-term (mean, 5 years 5 months). Facial contour deformities at presentation included prominent nose (63%), flat cheekbones (96%), flat midface (96%), weak chin (91%), obtuse neck-to-chin angle (56%), wide lip separation (95%), and excess maxillary dental show (99%). Correction of all pretreatment facial contour deformities was confirmed in 92% of patients after surgery. Long face patients with higher preoperative body mass index levels were more likely to have residual facial dysmorphology after surgery (P = .0009).
Conclusion: Using orthognathic surgery techniques, patients with LF dentofacial deformity achieved the planned occlusion and most maintained the corrected occlusion long-term. In unoperated patients with LF, a "facial esthetic type" was identified. Orthognathic surgery proved effective in correcting associated facial dysmorphology in most patients.
(Copyright © 2017 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE