Comparison of fat suppression capability for chest MR imaging with Dixon, SPAIR and STIR techniques at 3 Tesla MR system.

Autor: Kishida Y; Division of Radiology, Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan. Electronic address: yjk121@med.kobe-u.ac.jp., Koyama H; Division of Radiology, Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan., Seki S; Division of Radiology, Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan., Yoshikawa T; Advanced Biomedical Imaging Research Center, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan; Division of Functional and Diagnostic Imaging Research, Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan., Kyotani K; Center for Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Kobe University Hospital, Kobe, Japan., Okuaki T; Philips Healthcare, Tokyo, Japan., Sugimura K; Division of Radiology, Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan., Ohno Y; Advanced Biomedical Imaging Research Center, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan; Division of Functional and Diagnostic Imaging Research, Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Magnetic resonance imaging [Magn Reson Imaging] 2018 Apr; Vol. 47, pp. 89-96. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Nov 24.
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2017.11.012
Abstrakt: Purpose: To directly compare fat suppression efficacy of Dixon, spectral attenuated inversion recovery (SPAIR) and short tau inversion recovery (STIR) techniques for a 3T MR system.
Materials and Methods: Nineteen consecutive patients (11 men, 8 women; mean age 67.9years) underwent chest MR imaging. Contrast-noise ratio (CNR) between muscle and fat (CNR Fat ) was calculated by ROI measurement. Then, two radiologists used a five-point scale for visual assessment of image quality, fat suppression capability and lesion detection. Next, the quantitative calculations obtained with all three techniques were compared by means of Tukey's honest significant difference (HSD) test. Inter-observer agreements were assessed by kappa statistics and χ 2 test. Fisher's least significant difference (LSD) test was used for comparison among all scores.
Results: CNR Fat of SPAIR were significantly higher than those of Dixon and STIR (p<0.001). Inter-observer agreements were assessed as significantly moderate, substantial or almost perfect (0.51<κ<0.89, p<0.0001). Total image quality and fat suppression capability of Dixon and STIR were significantly higher than those of SPAIR (p<0.001).
Conclusion: Dixon technique has better fat suppression capability on T2-weighted turbo SE imaging than SPAIR technique on chest MR imaging examined with a 3T MR system, although it can't substitute STIR technique on fat suppression and lesion visualization.
(Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: