Is There a Moral Right to Nonmedical Vaccine Exemption?

Autor: Emhoff IA; MD FACS, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, Iam620@mail.harvard.edu., Fugate E; BA, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, Elf384@mail.harvard.edu., Eyal N; D. Phil., Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Department of Global Health and Population, 651 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, neyal@hsph.harvard.edu.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: American journal of law & medicine [Am J Law Med] 2016 May; Vol. 42 (2-3), pp. 598-620.
DOI: 10.1177/0098858816658281
Abstrakt: A recent measles outbreak in the United States was linked to a single source, yet it spanned eighteen jurisdictions and infected 121 people. 1 Forty-seven states currently allow legal exemption from vaccination on religious grounds, eighteen of which also allow it on philosophical grounds. 2 Recent research usually accepts a fundamental right to vaccine exemption and primarily seeks ways to protect herd immunity while also respecting that right, for example, by keeping the exemption available yet harder to procure or by imposing torts for infection-related injury. 3 We argue that when herd immunity is at risk, any moral claim to exemption from vaccination on conscientious, philosophical, or religious grounds is overridden. Our argument rests on an analogy to a series of situations in which a person puts others at risk through philosophically or religiously motivated choices. In these situations, intuitively, there is no claim-right to compromise the safety of others. Similarly, we propose, there is no claim-right to refuse vaccination, regardless of one's conscience, when refusal is sufficiently likely to seriously affect herd immunity and the safety of others. We also address several counterarguments. The lack of a claim-right to exemption when herd immunity is at risk does not mean, however, that it is always prudent for the state to force vaccination, or even that forcing vaccinations must be legal. Alternatives to forced vaccination may prove wiser and more conducive to high vaccination rates.
Databáze: MEDLINE