Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for ovarian protection during cancer chemotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Autor: Senra JC; Division of Human Reproduction, Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil., Roque M; ORIGEN - Center for Reproductive Medicine, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Talim MCT; Division of Human Reproduction, Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil., Reis FM; Division of Human Reproduction, Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil., Tavares RLC; Division of Human Reproduction, Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology [Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol] 2018 Jan; Vol. 51 (1), pp. 77-86. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Dec 01.
DOI: 10.1002/uog.18934
Abstrakt: Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) administration before and/or during cancer chemotherapy for the protection of ovarian reserve in premenopausal women without prior diagnosis of infertility.
Methods: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing administration of GnRHa before and/or during chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone. Eligible participants were premenopausal women at any stage of cancer, without previous diagnosis of infertility. An electronic database search in MEDLINE, CENTRAL, LILACS and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed. After selecting eligible studies, the relative risk (RR) was assessed for primary ovarian insufficiency (POI)/amenorrhea and for spontaneous pregnancy after completion of treatment.
Results: Thirteen RCTs comparing concurrent use of GnRHa and chemotherapy (609 participants) with chemotherapy alone (599 participants) were eligible for meta-analysis. All trials were open-label and patients had been treated for breast cancer (n = 1099) or lymphoma (n = 109). GnRHa had a significant benefit on the risk of POI/amenorrhea (RR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.45-0.79), which persisted in subgroup analysis for breast cancer (RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.43-0.77) but not for lymphoma patients (RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.20-2.47). The rate of spontaneous pregnancy after completion of treatment was higher in women receiving GnRHa plus chemotherapy compared with those receiving chemotherapy alone (RR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.01-2.02). Overall, the quality of evidence was low due to the unclear risk of bias, short follow-up and lack of objective assessment of ovarian function and reserve.
Conclusions: Evidence, albeit of low quality, supports the use of GnRHa before and/or during chemotherapy to reduce the risk of POI and increase the probability of spontaneous pregnancy in the short term. Further high quality RCTs with more accurate assessment of ovarian reserve are needed to support definitive recommendations for clinical practice. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
(Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
Databáze: MEDLINE