A comparison of the non-invasive ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) with the oesophageal Doppler monitor during major abdominal surgery.
Autor: | Hodgson LE; Anaesthetics & Intensive Care Department, Western Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, UK., Forni LG; Intensive Care Department, The Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK., Venn R; Anaesthetics & Intensive Care Department, Western Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, UK., Samuels TL; Intensive Care Department, The Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK., Wakeling HG; Anaesthetics & Intensive Care Department, Western Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, UK. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Journal of the Intensive Care Society [J Intensive Care Soc] 2016 May; Vol. 17 (2), pp. 103-110. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Oct 14. |
DOI: | 10.1177/1751143715610785 |
Abstrakt: | Background: Perioperative interventions, targeted to increase global blood flow defined by explicit measured goals, reduce postoperative complications. Consequently, reliable non-invasive estimation of the cardiac output could have far-reaching benefit. Methods: This study compared a non-invasive Doppler device - the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) - with the oesophageal Doppler monitor (ODM), on 25 patients during major abdominal surgery. Stroke volume was determined by USCOM (SV Results: A ≥ 10% change (Δ) SV Conclusions: Following fluid challenges SV |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |