Study of Variation in Dose Calculation Accuracy Between kV Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and kV fan-Beam Computed Tomography.

Autor: Kaliyaperumal V; Department of Radiation Oncology, Amala Institute of Medical Sciences, Thrissur, Kerala, India., Raphael CJ; Department of Radiation Oncology, Amala Institute of Medical Sciences, Thrissur, Kerala, India., Varghese KM; Department of Radiation Oncology, Amala Institute of Medical Sciences, Thrissur, Kerala, India., Gopu P; Department of Radiation Oncology, Amala Institute of Medical Sciences, Thrissur, Kerala, India., Sivakumar S; Department of Radiation Oncology, Amala Institute of Medical Sciences, Thrissur, Kerala, India., Boban M; Department of Radiation Oncology, Amala Institute of Medical Sciences, Thrissur, Kerala, India., Raj NAN; Centre for Biomaterials, Cellular and Molecular Theranostics, VIT University, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India., Senthilnathan K; Department of Physics, School of Advanced Sciences VIT University, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India., Babu PR; Department of Physics, School of Advanced Sciences VIT University, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of medical physics [J Med Phys] 2017 Jul-Sep; Vol. 42 (3), pp. 171-180.
DOI: 10.4103/jmp.JMP_24_17
Abstrakt: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images are presently used for geometric verification for daily patient positioning. In this work, we have compared the images of CBCT with the images of conventional fan beam CT (FBCT) in terms of image quality and Hounsfield units (HUs). We also compared the dose calculated using CBCT with that of FBCT. Homogenous RW3 plates and Catphan phantom were scanned by FBCT and CBCT. In RW3 and Catphan phantom, percentage depth dose (PDD), profiles, isodose distributions (for intensity modulated radiotherapy plans), and calculated dose volume histograms were compared. The HU difference was within ± 20 HU (central region) and ± 30 HU (peripheral region) for homogeneous RW3 plates. In the Catphan phantom, the difference in HU was ± 20 HU in the central area and peripheral areas. The HU differences were within ± 30 HU for all HU ranges starting from -1000 to 990 in phantom and patient images. In treatment plans done with simple symmetric and asymmetric fields, dose difference (DD) between CBCT plan and FBCT plan was within 1.2% for both phantoms. In intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment plans, for different target volumes, the difference was <2%. This feasibility study investigated HU variation and dose calculation accuracy between FBCT and CBCT based planning and has validated inverse planning algorithms with CBCT. In our study, we observed a larger deviation of HU values in the peripheral region compared to the central region. This is due to the ring artifact and scatter contribution which may prevent the use of CBCT as the primary imaging modality for radiotherapy treatment planning. The reconstruction algorithm needs to be modified further for improving the image quality and accuracy in HU values. However, our study with TG-119 and intensity modulated radiotherapy test targets shows that CBCT can be used for adaptive replanning as the recalculation of dose with the anisotropic analytical algorithm is in full accord with conventional planning CT except in the build-up regions. Patient images with CBCT have to be carefully analyzed for any artifacts before using them for such dose calculations.
Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest.
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: