Good Feasibility of the New German Blood Donor Questionnaire.
Autor: | Houareau C; Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany., Deitenbeck R; German Red Cross Blood Donation Service West, Hagen, Germany., Sümnig A; Institute for Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, University Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany., Moeller A; Institute for Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, University Gießen, Gießen, Germany., Saadé C; Institute for Laboratory Medicine, Transfusion Medicine and Microbiology, Helios Clinic, Pforzheim, Germany., Stötzer F; German Red Cross Blood Donation Service Baden-Württemberg-Hessen, Mannheim, Germany., Heiden M; Department for Transfusion Medicine, Paul Ehrlich Institute, Langen, Germany., Northoff H; Center for Clinical Transfusion Medicine, ZKT, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany., Offergeld R; Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie [Transfus Med Hemother] 2017 Aug; Vol. 44 (4), pp. 232-239. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Jul 14. |
DOI: | 10.1159/000477942 |
Abstrakt: | Background: We assessed the effect of the uniform donor questionnaire (UDQ) on deferral rates in first-time and repeat donors. We focused on the introduced question about unprotected sexual contact with a new partner. Another goal was a stratified comparison of the deferral rates of the donor questionnaire (DQ) and UDQ. Methods: Data on donors and deferrals using the DQ and UDQ were collected at four blood establishments. The comparison included a 2-year period by questionnaire version. For the comparison of the questionnaires, an adjusted multinomial logistic regression was performed. Results: The analysis included 260,848 donations. First-time (FTD) and repeat donations (RD) showed higher deferral rates with the UDQ (FTD +5.4%, RD +1.4%). Deferral due to a new partner was 3.0% in first-time and 0.4% in repeat donors. The majority of these occurred in the youngest age groups. The most frequent deferral criterion was 'disease' (5.1%). Conclusion: The regression revealed stronger predictors for deferral than the questionnaire version. Especially younger age carried a higher and independent risk for deferral. The additional deferrals of mainly young first-time donors due to a new sexual partner may identify those donors with potential heterosexual risk behavior who would otherwise not be identified. |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |