Switch of Intravitreal Therapy for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion from Anti-VEGF to Dexamethasone Implant and Vice Versa.
Autor: | Pielen A; University Eye Hospital, Hanover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.; Eye Center, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany., Bühler AD; University Eye Hospital, Hanover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.; Eye Center, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany., Heinzelmann SU; Eye Center, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany., Böhringer D; Eye Center, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany., Ness T; Eye Center, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany., Junker B; University Eye Hospital, Hanover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.; Eye Center, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Journal of ophthalmology [J Ophthalmol] 2017; Vol. 2017, pp. 5831682. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Jul 30. |
DOI: | 10.1155/2017/5831682 |
Abstrakt: | Purpose: To evaluate the anatomical and functional outcome of intravitreal dexamethasone implant for macular edema secondary to central (C) or branch (B) retinal vein occlusion (RVO) in patients with persistent macular edema (ME) refractory to intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment compared to treatment naïve patients and to dexamethasone-refractory eyes switched to anti-VEGF. Methods: Retrospective, observational study including 30 eyes previously treated with anti-VEGF (8 CRVO, 22 BRVO, mean age 69 ± 10 yrs), compared to 11 treatment naïve eyes (6 CRVO, 5 BRVO, 73 ± 11 yrs) and compared to dexamethasone nonresponders (2 CRVO, 4 BRVO, 69 ± 12). Outcome parameters were change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central foveal thickness (CFT) measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Results: Mean BCVA improvement after switch to dexamethasone implant was 4 letters ( p = 0.08), and treatment naïve eyes gained 10 letters ( p = 0.66), while we noted no change in eyes after switch to anti-VEGF ( p = 0.74). Median CFT decrease was most pronounced in treatment naïve patients (-437 μ m, p = 0.002) compared to anti-VEGF refractory eyes (-170 μ m, p = 0.003) and dexamethasone-refractory eyes (-157, p = 0.31). Conclusions: Dexamethasone significantly reduced ME secondary to RVO refractory to anti-VEGF. Functional gain was limited compared to treatment naïve eyes, probably due to worse BCVA and CFT at baseline in treatment naïve eyes. |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |