Comparative study of pain in women submitted to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Autor:	Terra JA Júnior; PhD, Full Professor, Department of Surgery, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro (UFTM), Uberaba-MG, Brazil. Scientific content of the study, technical procedures, critical revision., Terra GA; MD, School of Medicine, UFTM, Uberaba-MG, Brazil. Scientific content of the study, manuscript writing, critical revision., Borges MC; PhD, Physiotherapist, Department of Surgery, UFTM, Uberaba-MG, Brazil. Intellectual and scientific content of the study, manuscript writing, critical revision., Takeuti TD; MS, Biomedical, Department of Surgery, UFTM, Uberaba-MG, Brazil. Intellectual and scientific content of the study, manuscript writing, critical revision., Castro LGP; MD, School of Medicine, UFTM, Uberaba-MG, Brazil. Scientific content of the study, manuscript writing, critical revision., Lima SS; Administrative Analyst, Sabin Laboratory, Brasilia-DF, Brazil. Intellectual and scientific content of the study, critical revision., Fernandes LFRM; PhD, Physiotherapist, Department of Physiotherapy, UFTM, Uberaba-MG, Brazil. Intellectual and scientific content of the study, manuscript writing, critical revision., Silva AAD; PhD, Full Professor, Department of Surgery, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro (UFTM), Uberaba-MG, Brazil. Scientific content of the study, technical procedures, critical revision., Crema E; PhD, Full Professor, Department of Surgery, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro (UFTM), Uberaba-MG, Brazil. Scientific content of the study, technical procedures, critical revision.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Acta cirurgica brasileira [Acta Cir Bras] 2017 Jun; Vol. 32 (6), pp. 475-481.
DOI:	10.1590/s0102-865020170060000008
Abstrakt:	Purpose:: To evaluate postoperative pain in patients submitted to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy with four ports versus single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy with only one port. Methods:: Twenty-one patients were included in the conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy group and 19 other patients in the single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy group. A VAS was used for the assessment of postoperative pain at three time points. Differences were considered statistically significant when p<0.05. Results:: Intergroup analysis showed no significant difference in VAS scores between the conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy and single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy groups at any of the time points studied. Conclusion:: This study found no significant difference in postoperative pain between the two groups.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu