[Charges and convictions of psychiatrists for the violent behavior of the patient: psychiatric-forensic remarks].

Autor:	Nivoli G; Clinica Psichiatrica, Università di Sassari., Lorettu L; Clinica Psichiatrica, Università di Sassari., Carpiniello B; Clinica Psichiatrica, Università di Sassari., Milia P; Clinica Psichiatrica, Università di Sassari., Pinna F; Clinica Psichiatrica, Università di Sassari., Lepretti A; Clinica Psichiatrica, Università di Sassari., Depalmas C; Clinica Psichiatrica, Università di Sassari., Nivoli AMA; Clinica Psichiatrica, Università di Sassari.
Jazyk:	italština
Zdroj:	Rivista di psichiatria [Riv Psichiatr] 2017 May-Jun; Vol. 52 (3), pp. 101-108.
DOI:	10.1708/2722.27761
Abstrakt:	Purpose of the present study is to point-out a number of psychiatric-forensic remarks about the management of violent behavior against the person (VBP) amongst psychiatric patients. The study is the authors' personal contribution based on clinical and forensic experience as experts in the management of psychiatric patients with VBP. Twelve psychiatric-forensic remarks have been highlighted in the present study: 1) VBP is a multifactorial event; 2) the risk of VBP against the person may change rapidly over time in quantity and quality; 3) there are no methods for reliable prediction of VBP in a single clinical-case; 4) there are no medications with an indication of "heal" the VBP; 5) there are no therapeutic measures that neutralize always, quickly and without recurrences VBP; 6) there exist clinical hypotheses to assess VBP; 7) there exist principles of victimology to assess VBP; 8) there are emotional reactions that can affect the evaluation and clinical and forensic management of VBP; 9) the responsibility of the psychiatrist has to be evaluated at the moment of the events; 10) the responsibility of the psychiatrist must be contextualized in the single clinical-case; 11) there is the need to clarify the individual professional responsibility of psychiatrists who treated a patient; 12) there is the need to clarify the criteria for the definition of the guarantee role. The above-mentioned twelve psychiatric-forensic remarks have implications in the assessment and management of psychiatric patients with violent behavior. They may constitute a basis for further discussion aiming to obtain consensus amongst psychiatrists about good clinical practice and forensic implication in the management of psychiatric patients with VBP and to avoid charges and convictions.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu