Potential risks of using cement-augmented screws for spinal fusion in patients with low bone quality.

Autor: Martín-Fernández M; Spine Department, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz-UAM, Madrid, Spain., López-Herradón A; Spine Department, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz-UAM, Madrid, Spain., Piñera AR; Spine Department, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz-UAM, Madrid, Spain., Tomé-Bermejo F; Spine Department, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz-UAM, Madrid, Spain., Duart JM; Spine Department, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz-UAM, Madrid, Spain., Vlad MD; Faculty of Medical Bioengineering, 'Gr. T. Popa' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania., Rodríguez-Arguisjuela MG; Spine Department, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz-UAM, Madrid, Spain., Alvarez-Galovich L; Spine Department, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz-UAM, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: LAlvarez@fjd.es.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society [Spine J] 2017 Aug; Vol. 17 (8), pp. 1192-1199. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Jun 09.
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.04.029
Abstrakt: Background Context: Dramatic increases in the average life expectancy have led to increases in the variety of degenerative changes and deformities observed in the aging spine. The elderly population can present challenges for spine surgeons, not only because of increased comorbidities, but also because of the quality of their bones. Pedicle screws are the implants used most commonly in spinal surgery for fixation, but their efficacy depends directly on bone quality. Although polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)-augmented screws represent an alternative for patients with osteoporotic vertebrae, their use has raised some concerns because of the possible association between cement leakages (CLs) and other morbidities.
Purpose: To analyze potential complications related to the use of cement-augmented screws for spinal fusion and to investigate the effectiveness of using these screws in the treatment of patients with low bone quality.
Study Design: A retrospective single-center study.
Patient Sample: This study included 313 consecutive patients who underwent spinal fusion using a total of 1,780 cement-augmented screws.
Methods and Outcome Measures: We analyzed potential complications related to the use of cement-augmented screws, including CL, vascular injury, infection, screw extraction problems, revision surgery, and instrument failure. There are no financial conflicts of interest to report.
Results: A total of 1,043 vertebrae were instrumented. Cement leakage was observed in 650 vertebrae (62.3%). There were no major clinical complications related to CL, but two patients (0.6%) had radicular pain related to CL at the S1 foramina. Of the 13 patients (4.1%) who developed deep infections requiring surgical debridement, two with chronic infections had possible spondylitis that required instrument removal. All patients responded well to antibiotic therapy. Revision surgery was performed in 56 patients (17.9%), most of whom had long construction. A total of 180 screws were removed as a result of revision. There were no problems with screw extraction.
Conclusions: These results demonstrate the efficacy and safety of cement-augmented screws for the treatment of patients with low bone mineral density.
(Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: