Comparison of serum creatinine-based estimating equations with gates protocol for predicting glomerular filtration rate in indian population.

Autor: Mulay AV; Department of Nephrology, Dialysis Unit, Inlaks and Budhrani Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India; Kidney Research and Support Network Trust, Pune, Maharashtra, India., Gokhale SM; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inlaks and Budhrani Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Indian journal of nephrology [Indian J Nephrol] 2017 Mar-Apr; Vol. 27 (2), pp. 124-128.
DOI: 10.4103/0971-4065.200515
Abstrakt: In clinical practice, serum creatinine-based predicting equations and Gates protocol based on gamma camera imaging of kidneys after injection of Tc99m-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) are commonly used to assess glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Comparison of these methods, especially the chronic kidney disease-epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation with gold standard method of assessment of GFR by plasma clearance of Tc-99mDTPA is not well-studied in Indian population. We conducted this study to compare GFR estimation by gamma camera-based Gates protocol and serum creatinine-based predicting equations with GFR measured by plasma clearance of Tc-99mDTPA. One hundred and five patients (65 male and 40 female) underwent Tc-99m DTPA renal scan followed by withdrawal of venous blood samples at 2, 3, and 4 h as per predefined protocol. Gates method GFR (GFR s ) was assessed using standard protocol. GFR by plasma sampling (GFR p ) was calculated by slope-intercept method with provision for corrections. Estimated GFR was calculated by Cockroft-Gault formula, four variable modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) equation, and CKD-EPI equation (GFR CG, GFR MDRD , GFR CKD-EPI , respectively). GFR measured by gold standard method (GFR p ) was compared with that estimated by other methods by calculating correlation coefficient, bias, precision, and accuracy. GFR estimated by all three estimating equations correlated better than GFR s with GFR p. For estimating GFR p , GFR CKD-EPI had highest correlation with GFR p with least bias and highest precision. Gamma camera-based Gates protocol was the least precise and least accurate method for estimating GFR p . To conclude, all three estimating equations based on serum creatinine are superior to Tc-99m DTPA scintigraphy for estimating GFR; CKD-EPI equation being the most accurate and precise.
Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest.
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: