Sustained participation in a pay-for-value program: impact on high-need patients.
| Autor: | Cross DA; University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48108. E-mail: dacross@umich.edu., Cohen GR, Harris Lemak C, Adler-Milstein J |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | The American journal of managed care [Am J Manag Care] 2017 Feb 01; Vol. 23 (2), pp. e33-e40. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Feb 01. |
| Abstrakt: | Objective: To assess whether multi-year engagement by primary care practices in a pay-for-value program was associated with improved care for high-need patients. Study Design: Longitudinal cohort study of 17,443 patients with 2 or more conditions who were assigned to primary care providers (PCPs) within 1582 practices that did and did not continuously participate in Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan's pay-for-value program (the Physician Group Incentive Program [PGIP]) between 2010 and 2013. Methods: We used generalized linear mixed models, with patient-level random effects, to assess the relationship between whether practices continuously participated in PGIP and those practices' cost, use, and quality outcomes (derived from claims data) over a 4-year period. For most outcomes, models estimated the odds of any cost and utilization, as well as the amount of cost and utilization contingent on having any. Results: High-need patients whose PCPs continuously participated in PGIP had lower odds of 30- and 90-day readmissions (odds ratio [OR], 0.65 and 0.63, respectively; P <.01 for both) over time compared with patients with PCPs who did not continuously participate. They also appeared to have lower odds of any emergency department visits (OR, 0.88; P <.01) and receive higher overall quality (1.6% higher; P <.01), as well as medication management-specific quality (3.0% higher; P <.01). We observed no differences in overall medical-surgical cost. Conclusions: Continuous PCP participation in a pay-for-value program was associated with lower use and improved quality over time, but not lower costs, for high-need patients. National policy efforts to engage PCPs in pay-for-value reimbursement is therefore likely to achieve some intended outcomes but may not be sufficient to deliver care that is of substantially higher value. |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|