Is tapentadol different from classical opioids? A review of the evidence.

Autor: Langford RM; Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK., Knaggs R; University of Nottingham, Nottingam, UK., Farquhar-Smith P; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK., Dickenson AH; University College London, London, UK.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: British journal of pain [Br J Pain] 2016 Nov; Vol. 10 (4), pp. 217-221. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Jul 25.
DOI: 10.1177/2049463716657363
Abstrakt: Tapentadol is a single molecule able to deliver analgesia by two distinct mechanisms, a feature which differentiates it from many other analgesics. Pre-clinical data demonstrate two mechanisms of action: mu-opioid receptor agonist activity and noradrenaline re-uptake inhibition. From these, one may predict that tapentadol would be applicable across a broad spectrum of pain from nociceptive to neuropathic. The evidence in animal models suggests that norepinephrine re-uptake inhibition (NRI) is a key mechanism and may even predominate over opioid actions in chronic (and especially neuropathic) pain states, reinforcing that tapentadol is different to classical opioids and may, therefore, be an a priori choice for the treatment of neuropathic and mixed pain. The clinical studies and subsequent practice experience and surveillance support the concept of opioid and non-opioid mechanisms of action. The reduced incidence of some of the typical opioid-induced side effects, compared to equianalgesic doses of classical opioids, supports the hypothesis that tapentadol analgesia is only partially mediated by opioid agonist mechanisms. Both the pre-clinical and clinical profiles appear to be differentiated from those of classical opioids.
Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The manuscript was produced solely by the four authors, devoid of any editorial input or influence. Grünenthal Ltd has only checked the article for correctness and has not exercised any editorial rights.
Databáze: MEDLINE