Experimental analysis of using examples and non-examples in safety training.

Autor: Taylor MA; Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, USA; Department of Psychology, Queens College and the Graduate Center, City University of New York, USA. Electronic address: taylormatthewa@yahoo.com., Wirth O; Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, USA., Olvina M; Department of Psychology, Queens College and the Graduate Center, City University of New York, USA., Alvero AM; Department of Psychology, Queens College and the Graduate Center, City University of New York, USA.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of safety research [J Safety Res] 2016 Dec; Vol. 59, pp. 97-104. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Oct 15.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2016.10.002
Abstrakt: Introduction: The effects of training content consisting of examples and/or non-examples was studied on the acquisition of safety-related skills.
Method: Participants (N=160) were randomly assigned to first receive computer-based training on office ergonomics that included either no examples of safe or at-risk postures, safe examples only, at-risk examples only, or both safe and at-risk examples. Participants then attempted to classify as safe or at-risk various postures depicted in short video clips and demonstrate with their own posture the range of safe postures.
Results: Groups that were trained with both safe and at-risk examples showed greater classification accuracy and less error in their demonstration of safe postures. Training with only safe or at-risk examples resulted in a moderate amount of error and a consistent underestimation of risk.
Conclusion: Training content consisting of both examples and non-examples improved acquisition of safety-related skills.
Practical Applications: The strategic selection of training content may improve identification of risks and safe work practices.
(Published by Elsevier Ltd.)
Databáze: MEDLINE