In vitro Evaluation of Stainless Steel Crowns cemented with Resin-modified Glass Ionomer and Two New Self-adhesive Resin Cements.
Autor: | Pathak S; Postgraduate Student, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, College of Dental Sciences, Davangere, Karnataka, India., Shashibhushan KK; Professor, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, College of Dental Sciences, Davangere, Karnataka, India., Poornima P; Professor and Head, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, College of Dental Sciences, Davangere, Karnataka, India., Reddy VS; Professor, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, College of Dental Sciences, Davangere, Karnataka, India. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry [Int J Clin Pediatr Dent] 2016 Jul-Sep; Vol. 9 (3), pp. 197-200. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Sep 27. |
DOI: | 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1363 |
Abstrakt: | Aims: To assess and compare the retentive strength of two dual-polymerized self-adhesive resin cements (RelyX U200, 3M ESPE & SmartCem2, Dentsply Caulk) and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC; RelyX Luting 2, 3M ESPE) on stainless steel crown (SSC). Materials and Methods: Thirty extracted teeth were mounted on cold cured acrylic resin blocks exposing the crown till the cemento-enamel junction. Pretrimmed, precontoured SSC was selected for a particular tooth. Standardized tooth preparation for SSC was performed by single operator. The crowns were then luted with either RelyX U200 or SmartCem2 or RelyX Luting 2 cement. Retentive strength was tested using Instron universal testing machine. The retentive strength values were recorded and calculated by the formula: Load/Area. Statistical Analysis: One-way analysis of variance was used for multiple comparisons followed by post hoc Tukey's test for groupwise comparisons. Unpaired t-test was used for intergroup comparisons. Results: RelyX U200 showed significantly higher retentive strength than rest of the two cements (p < 0.001). No significant difference was found between the retentive strength of SmartCem2 and RelyX Luting 2 (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The retentive strength of dual-polymerized self-adhesive resin cements was better than RMGIC, and RelyX U200 significantly improved crown retention when compared with SmartCem2 and RelyX Luting 2. How to Cite This Article: Pathak S, Shashibhushan KK, Poornima P, Reddy VVS. In vitro Evaluation of Stainless Steel Crowns cemented with Resin-modified Glass Ionomer and Two New Self-adhesive Resin Cements. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2016;9(3):197-200. Competing Interests: Source of support: Nil Conflict of interest: None |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |