Life cycle assessment of carbon capture and utilization from ammonia process in Mexico.

Autor: Morales Mora MA; Coordinación de Sustentabilidad, Gerencia de Eficiencia Energética y Sustentabilidad, PEMEX. Jacarandas 100, Col. Rancho Alegre, CP. 96558, Coatzacoalcos, Veracruz, Mexico. Electronic address: miguelam133@gmail.com., Vergara CP; Facultad de Ingeniería Química, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Ciudad Universitaria, Av. Sn. Claudio y 18 sur, Col. Jardines de San Manuel, 72570, Puebla, Pue, Mexico. Electronic address: pretelinvf@yahoo.com.mx., Leiva MA; Gerencia de Eficiencia Energética y Sustentabilidad, PEMEX, Av. Marina Nacional 329, Col. Petróleos Mexicanos, Del. Miguel Hidalgo, CP.11311, Ciudad de México, Mexico. Electronic address: mleiva2000@yahoo.com.mx., Martínez Delgadillo SA; Depto. Ciencias Básicas, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Azcapotzalco, Av. San Pablo 180, Azcapotzalco, CP 02200, D. F, Mexico. Electronic address: samd@correo.azc.uam.mx., Rosa-Domínguez ER; Facultad de Química-Farmacia, Universidad Central Marta Abreu de Las Villas, Cuba, Carretera Camajuaní km 5½, Santa Clara, Villa Clara, C.P. 54830, Cuba. Electronic address: erosa@uclv.edu.cu.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of environmental management [J Environ Manage] 2016 Dec 01; Vol. 183 (Pt 3), pp. 998-1008. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Sep 28.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.048
Abstrakt: Post-combustion CO 2 capture (PCC) of flue gas from an ammonia plant (AP) and the environmental performance of the carbon capture utilization (CCU) technology for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to an enhanced oil recovery (EOR) system in Mexico was performed as case study. The process simulations (PS) and life cycle assessment (LCA) were used as supporting tools to quantify the CO 2 capture and their environmental impacts, respectively. Two scenarios were considered: 1) the AP with its shift and CO 2 removal unit and 2) Scenario 1 plus PCC of the flue gas from the AP primary reformer (AP-2CO 2 ) and the global warming (GW) impact. Also, the GW of the whole of a CO 2 -EOR project, from these two streams of captured CO 2 , was evaluated. Results show that 372,426 tCO 2 /year can be PCC from the flue gas of the primary reformer and 480,000 tons/y of capacity from the AP. The energy requirement for solvent regeneration is estimated to be 2.8 MJ/kgCO 2 or a GW impact of 0.22 kgCO 2e /kgCO 2 captured. GW performances are 297.6 kgCO 2e emitted/barrel (bbl) for scenario one, and 106.5 kgCO 2e emitted/bbl for the second. The net emissions, in scenario one, were 0.52 tCO 2e /bbl and 0.33 tCO 2e /bbl in scenario two. Based on PS, this study could be used to evaluate the potential of CO 2 capture of 4080 t/d of 4 ammonia plants. The integration of PS-LCA to a PCC study allows the applicability as methodological framework for the development of a cluster of projects in which of CO 2 could be recycled back to fuel, chemical, petrochemical products or for enhanced oil recovery (EOR). With AP-2CO 2, "CO 2 emission free" ammonia production could be achieved.
(Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: