Research Priorities from Animal Behaviour for Maximising Conservation Progress.

Autor: Greggor AL; Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA. Electronic address: Alison.L.Greggor@dartmouth.edu., Berger-Tal O; Mitrani Department of Desert Ecology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Midreshet Ben-Gurion, Israel., Blumstein DT; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA., Angeloni L; Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA., Bessa-Gomes C; Ecologie Systématique Evolution, Université Paris-Sud, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France., Blackwell BF; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, CO, USA., St Clair CC; Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada., Crooks K; Department of Fish, Wildlife, & Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA., de Silva S; Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, Front Royal, VA, USA; Trunks & Leaves Inc, Newtonville, MA, USA., Fernández-Juricic E; Purdue University, Department of Biological Sciences, West Lafayette, IN, USA., Goldenberg SZ; Department of Fish, Wildlife, & Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA; Save the Elephants, Nairobi, Kenya., Mesnick SL; Southwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, CA, USA., Owen M; Institute for Conservation Research, San Diego Zoo Global, Escondido, CA, USA., Price CJ; School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia., Saltz D; Mitrani Department of Desert Ecology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Midreshet Ben-Gurion, Israel., Schell CJ; Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, CO, USA., Suarez AV; Department of Animal Biology and Department of Entomology, University of Illinois, Champaign, IL, USA., Swaisgood RR; Institute for Conservation Research, San Diego Zoo Global, Escondido, CA, USA., Winchell CS; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Conservation Partnerships Program, Carlsbad, CA, USA., Sutherland WJ; Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Trends in ecology & evolution [Trends Ecol Evol] 2016 Dec; Vol. 31 (12), pp. 953-964. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Sep 28.
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.09.001
Abstrakt: Poor communication between academic researchers and wildlife managers limits conservation progress and innovation. As a result, input from overlapping fields, such as animal behaviour, is underused in conservation management despite its demonstrated utility as a conservation tool and countless papers advocating its use. Communication and collaboration across these two disciplines are unlikely to improve without clearly identified management needs and demonstrable impacts of behavioural-based conservation management. To facilitate this process, a team of wildlife managers and animal behaviour researchers conducted a research prioritisation exercise, identifying 50 key questions that have great potential to resolve critical conservation and management problems. The resulting agenda highlights the diversity and extent of advances that both fields could achieve through collaboration.
(Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: