Influence of tongue position on the determination of tooth shade.

Autor: Klinke TU; Associate Professor, University of Greifswald, Dental School, Department of Prosthodontics, Gerodontology and Dental Materials, Greifswald, Germany. Electronic address: klinke@uni-greifswald.de., Olms C; Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics and Material Science, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany., Pirek P; Associate Professor, Palacký University, Department of Prosthodontics, Olomouc, Czech Republic., Jakstat HA; Professor, Department of Prosthodontics and Material Science, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany., Hannak WB; Associate Professor, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Prosthodontics, Geriatric Dentistry, and Craniomandibular Dysfunction, Berlin, Germany.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: The Journal of prosthetic dentistry [J Prosthet Dent] 2017 Feb; Vol. 117 (2), pp. 289-293. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Sep 16.
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.07.012
Abstrakt: Statement of Problem: Dentists frequently use electronic devices to determine tooth color. However, neither the instructions for these devices nor the accompanying brochures refer to the environmental conditions required at the point of measurement.
Purpose: The purpose of this multicenter prospective clinical study was to reveal whether a change in the oral background influences tooth color determination.
Material and Methods: Students (N=42) at the dental clinic in Berlin, Leipzig, Greifswald and Olomouc (women n=27, men n=15) participated in this study. It was their first contact with the spectral photometer (Easyshade Advance 4.0; VITA Zahnfabrik). After a short introduction on how to use the device, the students made 1-point measurements on the same patient on the maxillary central incisor. In the first measurement, the patient's mouth was open, and the palatal surface uncovered. In the second measurement, the patient's mouth was closed slightly, and the tongue pressed on the lingual surface of the maxillary central incisor. The mean ±SD and the 95% confidence interval (95 % CI) were calculated using the Student t test for each test series (α=.05).
Results: Statistical evaluation of the 2 measurements revealed changes in the L*a*b* values with a mean L*=0.204, a*=-0.351, and b*=0.02; a median of 0.4, -0.3, and -0.1, respectively; a ±SD of 2.37, 0.64, and 0.89, respectively; and 95% CIs of L*=-0.476 to 0.884, a*=-0.531 to -0.702, and b*=-0.23 to 0.52, respectively. These differences were not statistically significant (P>.05). The measurements of L*, a*, and b* with and without tongue coverage of the lingual surfaces of the maxillary teeth did not show any statistically significant differences (P=.663).
Conclusions: The results demonstrate that the position of the tongue does not influence measurement accuracy during the application of the Easyshade Advance device.
(Copyright © 2016 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: