Use of HbA1c to diagnose type 2 diabetes mellitus among high risk Sri Lankan adults.
Autor: | Herath HMM; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ruhuna, P.O. Box 70, Galle, Sri Lanka. Electronic address: herathtp@gmail.com., Weerarathna TP; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ruhuna, P.O. Box 70, Galle, Sri Lanka., Dahanayake MU; Teaching Hospital, Karapitiya, Galle, Sri Lanka., Weerasinghe NP; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ruhuna, P.O. Box 70, Galle, Sri Lanka. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Diabetes & metabolic syndrome [Diabetes Metab Syndr] 2017 Oct - Dec; Vol. 11 (4), pp. 251-255. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Aug 23. |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.dsx.2016.08.021 |
Abstrakt: | Aim: Even though, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was found to be effective in predicting diabetes especially in Caucasians there is limited evidence of its diagnostic utility in high risk Sri Lankan adults. This study aimed to determine the optimal HbA1c cut-off points for detecting diabetes in a high risk population in Sri Lanka. Materials and Methods: This community based study consisted of 254 previously healthy adults with history of diabetes in one or more first-degree relatives. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) , glucose tolerance test (GTT) and HbA1c were measured in all and GTT was used as a reference to diagnose diabetes. Receiver operating characteristic curve was created to find the optimum HbA1c cut-off value to predict diabetes. Results: Prevalence of diabetes was 12.2% (n=31) with FPG and 16.1% (n=41) with GTT. Prevalence rose to 27.6% (P<0.01) when HbA1c with cut-off of ≥6.5% was used as the diagnostic test. The ROC curves showed the HbA1c threshold of 6.3% provided the optimum balance between sensitivity (80.5%) and specificity (79%). In compared to GTT, FPG had only a modest sensitivity (65%) in diagnosing diabetes in this high risk population. Conclusion: Our study showed that optimum HbA1C cut-off for detecting diabetes was 6.3% and it had better sensitivity, but lower specificity than FPG. This study further showed that the prevalence of diabetes would become double if HbA1c is used over FPG to screen this high risk population. (Copyright © 2016 Diabetes India. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |