Autor: |
Graham DY; Department of Medicine, VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas 77030., Tabibian N, Michaletz PA, Kinner BM, Schwartz JT, Heiser MC, Dixon WB, Smith JL |
Jazyk: |
angličtina |
Zdroj: |
Gastrointestinal endoscopy [Gastrointest Endosc] 1989 May-Jun; Vol. 35 (3), pp. 207-9. |
DOI: |
10.1016/s0016-5107(89)72759-0 |
Abstrakt: |
One of the goals of gastrointestinal endoscopy is to diagnose whether a lesion is malignant. The desire to improve the sensitivity of biopsy-sampling techniques prompted us to compare prospectively the reliability and accuracy of obtaining tissue by forceps biopsy, needle biopsy (21 gauge 13-mm long metal needles versus 18 gauge 20-mm long plastic needles), and salvage cytology in patients with endoscopically suspected malignancy. Samples were obtained in the order of needle biopsy (the order of metal and plastic needle biopsy was randomized), forceps biopsy, followed by salvage cytology. Needle biopsies were obtained by puncturing the lesion under direct vision while aspirating with a syringe. Twenty-three patients with gastrointestinal malignancy were studied (7 esophageal, 4 gastric, and 12 colonic). Forceps biopsies were positive in 18 of 23 (78%), missing 1 gastric and 4 colon malignancies. Metal needle biopsy was positive in 16 of 19 (84%), plastic needle biopsy in 17 of 22 (77%), and salvage cytology in 20 of 22 (91%). Accuracy was increased by a combination of techniques. Endoscopic needle biopsy is a simple and rapid method to evaluate lesions seen at endoscopy and is especially useful in evaluation of submucosal lesions. |
Databáze: |
MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |
|