Two liquid chromatographic approaches for the simultaneous determination of xipamide and its degradation product (2,6-xylidine) using time-programmed fluorescence detection.

Autor: Tolba MM; Department of Analytical Chemistry, University of Mansoura, Mansoura, Egypt., Belal F; Department of Analytical Chemistry, University of Mansoura, Mansoura, Egypt.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Luminescence : the journal of biological and chemical luminescence [Luminescence] 2017 Jun; Vol. 32 (4), pp. 491-501. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Aug 26.
DOI: 10.1002/bio.3203
Abstrakt: A study of the performance of reversed-phase chromatography with a programmable multiwavelength fluorimetric technique using either conventional hydro-organic or micellar eluent is established for the determination of xipamide (XIP) in the presence of its degradation product, 2,6-xylidine (XY). In conventional liquid chromatography (CLC), the analyses were carried out on a Promosil ODS 100 Å column (250 mm × 4.6 mm i.d., 5 μm) using a mobile phase consisting of methanol/0.1 M phosphate buffer (65: 35, v/v) at pH 4.0. For micellar liquid chromatography (MLC), a short Spherisorb column (150 mm × 4.6 mm i.d., 5 μm) was employed in conjunction with a greener mobile phase (pH 5.0) containing 0.1 M sodium dodecyl sulfate and 15% n-propanol. CLC proved to be superior to MLC in terms of sensitivity for the determination of the degradation product because it could detect trace amounts down to 10.0 ng/ml of XY as a degradation product in XIP. However, MLC represents an eco-friendly approach for the simultaneous determination of XIP and XY. In addition, the opportunity for the direct introduction of biological matrices into the chromatographic system is one of the distinctive benefits of MLC. The proposed methods were applied for the determination of XIP in its tablets, human urine and content uniformity testing. The results of the proposed methods were statistically compared with those obtained using the comparison fluorimetric method, revealing no significant differences in the performance of the methods regarding accuracy and precision.
(Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)
Databáze: MEDLINE