The Dissertation House Model: Doctoral Student Experiences Coping and Writing in a Shared Knowledge Community.
Autor: | Carter-Veale WY; Graduate School, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21250 drcarter@umbc.edu., Tull RG; Graduate School, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21250., Rutledge JC; Graduate School, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21250., Joseph LN; Division of Education, Downstate Graduate Programs, Alfred University, Alfred, NY 14802. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | CBE life sciences education [CBE Life Sci Educ] 2016 fall; Vol. 15 (3). |
DOI: | 10.1187/cbe.16-01-0081 |
Abstrakt: | The problem of PhD attrition, especially at the dissertation-writing stage, is not solely related to mentoring, departments, or disciplines; it is a problem that affects the entire institution. As such, solutions require collaborative efforts for student success. Building on Yeatman's master-apprentice model, which assumes mastering disciplinary writing in singular advisor-student contexts, and Burnett's collaborative cohort model, which introduced doctoral dissertation supervision in a collaborative-learning environment with several faculty mentors in a single discipline, the Dissertation House model (DHM) introduces a model of doctoral dissertation supervision that involves multiple mentors across several disciplines. On the basis of more than 200 students' reflections, we find that challenges in completing the dissertation extend beyond departmental and disciplinary boundaries. The DHM's multidisciplinary approach preserves the traditional master-apprentice relationship between faculty and students within academic departments while providing an additional support mechanism through interdisciplinary collaborative cohorts. Using Thoits's coping assistance theory and data from DH students over a 10-year period, the DHM incorporates Hoadley's concept of knowledge communities to establish a successful dissertation-writing intervention for graduate students across doctoral programs. Using propensity score analysis, we provide in this study an empirical assessment of the benefits and efficacy of the DHM. (© 2016 W. Y. Carter-Veale et al. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2016 The American Society for Cell Biology. This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0).) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |