Retrospective Evaluation of Anaesthetic Techniques for Caesarean.

Autor: Sarı MA; Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey., Küçükgüçlü S; Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey., Özbilgin Ş; Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey., Günenç FS; Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey., Mercan S; Faculty of Medicine Student, Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey., Esen A; Faculty of Medicine Student, Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey., Yetim B; Faculty of Medicine Student, Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation [Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim] 2015 Dec; Vol. 43 (6), pp. 373-80. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Dec 01.
DOI: 10.5152/TJAR.2015.91069
Abstrakt: Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the maternal, foetal and neonatal effects of anaesthetic techniques used in caesarean sections (C/S) retrospectively over 6 years at the Hospital of Medical School of Dokuz Eylül University and to compare the results with the literature from Turkey and developed countries.
Methods: After obtaining approval from the ethics committee, anaesthetic and gestational data from all caesarean operations performed over a 6-year period between 2005 and 2010 was retrospectively obtained from hospital archives.
Results: During this period, a total of 10,819 labours was conducted and C/S ratio was 55% with 5953 patients. General anaesthesia was performed in 1479 patients (24.8%) and regional anaesthesia was performed in 4474 patients (75.2%) [Spinal anaesthesia for 1203 patients (26.9%), epidural anaesthesia for 830 patients (18.5%) and combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia for 2441 patients (54.6%)]. In 2010, regional anaesthesia ratio increased to 84.6%, whereas in 2005, it was 63.8%. Regional anaesthesia was used significantly more often in both elective and urgent patients (82% elective and 65.2% emergency). Because of failed regional anaesthesia or surgical complications, anaesthesia was changed to general anaesthesia in 215 patients (4.8%). APGAR scores in 1 and 5 min were significantly higher with regional anaesthesia when compared with general anaesthesia.
Conclusion: Regional anaesthesia rate for C/S patients in the Hospital of Medical School of Dokuz Eylül University is increased and is higher than Turkey's average; but these figures are still lower than those in the developed countries.
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: