Policy challenges and approaches for the conservation of mangrove forests in Southeast Asia.

Autor: Friess DA; Department of Geography, National University of Singapore, 1 Arts Link, 117570, Singapore. dan.friess@nus.edu.sg., Thompson BS; Department of Geography, National University of Singapore, 1 Arts Link, 117570, Singapore., Brown B; Yayasan Hutan Biru-Blue Forests, Makassar, 90231, Sulawesi, Indonesia.; Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Ellengowan Drive, Darwin, NT, 0909, Australia., Amir AA; Institute for Environment and Development (LESTARI), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia., Cameron C; Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Ellengowan Drive, Darwin, NT, 0909, Australia., Koldewey HJ; Zoological Society of London, Outer Circle, Regents Park, London, NW1 4RY, U.K., Sasmito SD; Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Situ Gede, Bogor, 16115, Indonesia., Sidik F; Institute for Marine Research and Observation, Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Affairs, Jalan Baru Perancak, Negara-Jembrana, Bali, 82251, Indonesia.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology [Conserv Biol] 2016 Oct; Vol. 30 (5), pp. 933-49. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Aug 20.
DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12784
Abstrakt: Many drivers of mangrove forest loss operate over large scales and are most effectively addressed by policy interventions. However, conflicting or unclear policy objectives exist at multiple tiers of government, resulting in contradictory management decisions. To address this, we considered four approaches that are being used increasingly or could be deployed in Southeast Asia to ensure sustainable livelihoods and biodiversity conservation. First, a stronger incorporation of mangroves into marine protected areas (that currently focus largely on reefs and fisheries) could resolve some policy conflicts and ensure that mangroves do not fall through a policy gap. Second, examples of community and government comanagement exist, but achieving comanagement at scale will be important in reconciling stakeholders and addressing conflicting policy objectives. Third, private-sector initiatives could protect mangroves through existing and novel mechanisms in degraded areas and areas under future threat. Finally, payments for ecosystem services (PES) hold great promise for mangrove conservation, with carbon PES schemes (known as blue carbon) attracting attention. Although barriers remain to the implementation of PES, the potential to implement them at multiple scales exists. Closing the gap between mangrove conservation policies and action is crucial to the improved protection and management of this imperiled coastal ecosystem and to the livelihoods that depend on them.
(© 2016 Society for Conservation Biology.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: