Disability and Mental Disorders in the Canadian Armed Forces.

Autor:	Weeks M; Research and Analysis Section, Directorate of Mental Health, Canadian Forces Health Services Group, Ottawa, ON., Garber BG; Research and Analysis Section, Directorate of Mental Health, Canadian Forces Health Services Group, Ottawa, ON bryan.garber@forces.gc.ca., Zamorski MA; Research and Analysis Section, Directorate of Mental Health, Canadian Forces Health Services Group, Ottawa, ON Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie [Can J Psychiatry] 2016 Apr; Vol. 61 (1 Suppl), pp. 56S-63S.
DOI:	10.1177/0706743716628853
Abstrakt:	Objectives: The initial goal was to validate the use of a self-report measure of disability in the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF). The main goal was to document the extent of disability in personnel with and without mental disorders. Methods: Data were obtained from the 2013 Canadian Forces Mental Health Survey; the sample included 6700 Regular Forces personnel. Disability was measured with the 12-item version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS-2); established cut points were used to demarcate severe, moderate, minimal, and no disability. The following recent (past-year) and remote (lifetime but not past-year) disorders were assessed with diagnostic interviews: posttraumatic stress disorder, major depressive episode, generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, and alcohol use disorder. Results: The WHODAS-2 showed good internal consistency (α = 0.89) and a 1-factor structure. Most personnel had no disability (59.2%) or minimal disability (30.8%). However, an important minority had moderate or severe disability (8.4% and 1.6%, respectively). Individuals with recent disorders reported greater disability than those without lifetime disorders, although many had minimal or no disability (41.2% and 24.7%, respectively). Disability increased with the number of recent disorders. Relative to those without lifetime disorders, individuals with remote disorders showed slightly greater disability, but most had no disabilty (57.1%) or minimal disability (35.0%). Conclusions: The 12-item WHODAS-2 is a valid measure of disability in the CAF. Mental disorders may be important drivers of disability in this population, although limited residual disability is seen in individuals with remote disorders. (© The Author(s) 2016.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu