Comparison of the Prehospital Trauma Life Support recommendations and the German national guideline on treatment of patients with severe and multiple injuries.

Autor:	Häske D; From the Faculty of Medicine, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tuebingen, Germany (D.H.); Department of Surgery, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana (L.S.); Emergency Department, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany (M.B.); Emergency Department, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Dresden, Germany (A.R.H.); Emergency and Rescue Center, BG Trauma Clinic, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (U.S.); MegaMed Emergency Management, Annweiler, Germany (B.G.); and Emergency and Rescue Center, BG Trauma Clinic Ludwigshafen, Clinic for Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany (M.M.)., Stuke L, Bernhard M, Heller AR, Schweigkofler U, Gliwitzky B, Münzberg M
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	The journal of trauma and acute care surgery [J Trauma Acute Care Surg] 2016 Aug; Vol. 81 (2), pp. 388-93.
DOI:	10.1097/TA.0000000000001125
Abstrakt:	Background: The Prehospital Trauma Life Support (PHTLS) concept is well established throughout the world. The aim is to improve prehospital care for patients with major trauma. In 2011, a German Level 3 (S3) evidence- and consensus-based guideline on the treatment of patients with severe and multiple injuries was published. The scope of this study was the systematic comparison between the educational content of the worldwide PHTLS concept and the German S3 Guideline. Methods: A total of 62 key recommendations of the German S3 Guideline were compared with the content of the English PHTLS manual (eighth edition). Depending on the level of agreement, the recommendations were categorized as (1) agreement, (2) minor variation, or (3) major variation. Comparison was done via a rating system by a number of international experts in the field of out-of-hospital trauma care. The Delphi method was used to get the final statements by indistinct or board-ranged ratings. Results: Overall, there was no conformity in 12%. In 68% a total agreement and in 88% conformity with slight differences of minor variations were found between the key recommendations of the guideline and the PHTLS manual. The PHTLS primary assessment has a large conformity for the following individual priorities: airway, 92%; breathing, 92%; circulation, 63%; disability, 100%; exposure, 89%. Conclusions: According to our comparison, the PHTLS manual is largely compatible with the German S3 Guideline from 2011. The 12% divergent statements concern mainly fluid resuscitation. Minor deviations in the prehospital care are due to a national guideline with an emergency medical service with emergency physicians (S3 Guideline) and a global PHTLS concept.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu