Analysis of the maxillary dental arch after rapid maxillary expansion in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate.

Autor: Ayub PV; Postgraduate student, Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies, University of São Paulo, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil. Electronic address: priscilaayub@usp.br., Janson G; Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil., Gribel BF; Postgraduate student, Department of Orthodontics, Pontifical Catholic University, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil., Lara TS; Orthodontist, Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies, University of São Paulo, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil; professor, Brazilian Dental Association, Minas Gerais, Brazil., Garib DG; Associate professor, Department of Orthodontics, Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies and Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics [Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop] 2016 May; Vol. 149 (5), pp. 705-15.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.11.022
Abstrakt: Introduction: Although rapid maxillary expansion has been extensively studied in noncleft patients, scarce evidence of maxillary effects is found for patients with oral clefts. Our objective was to evaluate the dentoalveolar effects of rapid maxillary expansion in children with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate compared with noncleft patients.
Methods: The experimental group included 25 patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate and posterior crossbite (9 girls, 16 boys; mean age, 10.6 years). The control group comprised 27 noncleft patients with posterior crossbite (14 boys, 13 girls; mean age, 9.1 years). The experimental group had lip and palate repairs at 3 and 12 months of age, respectively, and maxillary expansion was indicated before a secondary alveolar bone graft. Digital dental models were obtained immediately before expansion and 6 months after expansion with a laser scanner. Canine and posterior tooth inclinations, transversal widths, arch perimeters, arch lengths, palatal depths, and palatal volumes were digitally measured. The paired t test was used for interphase comparisons, and the independent t test was used for intergroup comparisons (P <0.05).
Results: In the experimental group, expansion produced buccal tipping of the canines and posterior teeth and significant increases of all maxillary transverse measurements, arch perimeter, palatal volumes, and palatal depths; only arch lengths decreased. No differences were observed between the groups for any measurement, except for intermolar distance.
Conclusions: Rapid maxillary expansion produced similar changes in the patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate compared with the noncleft patients except for arch length and palatal depth that decreased after expansion in the children with oral clefts.
(Copyright © 2016 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: