| Autor: |
Paquette K; a Center for Social Innovation , Needham , Massachusetts , USA., Pannella Winn LA; a Center for Social Innovation , Needham , Massachusetts , USA. |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Zdroj: |
Journal of dual diagnosis [J Dual Diagn] 2016 Apr-Jun; Vol. 12 (2), pp. 153-62. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Apr 11. |
| DOI: |
10.1080/15504263.2016.1175262 |
| Abstrakt: |
Housing options for people exiting homelessness and seeking recovery from substance use disorders are limited. Policies tend to favor low-demand models such as housing first and permanent supportive housing that do not require abstinence, but offer immediate housing placement based on consumer choice and separate housing from clinical services. While these models have proven effective in promoting housing retention, especially among individuals with a primary diagnosis of mental illness, evidence to support positive outcomes related to people with a primary or co-occurring substance use disorder are mixed. Recovery housing models provide abstinence-focused environments and integrated peer support embedded within a recovery framework. Various models exist along a continuum from fully peer-run to clinically staffed residences. However, this continuum is typically separate from the homeless services system, and many barriers to integration persist. Recent national dialogues have begun to explore opportunities to integrate housing and substance use recovery approaches to meet the needs of people who need both types of support. This perspective paper argues that recovery housing is essential for supporting some homeless individuals and families. Within a comprehensive continuum based on choice, both recovery housing and low-demand models can support housing retention, reduce homelessness, promote recovery, and foster self-determination. |
| Databáze: |
MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
