| Autor: |
Souza JC; Center for Research on Dental Implants (CEPID), Post-Graduation Program in Dentistry (PPGO), School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil., Mota RR; School of Dentistry, Universidade Fernando Pessoa, Porto, Portugal., Sordi MB; Center for Research on Dental Implants (CEPID), Post-Graduation Program in Dentistry (PPGO), School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil., Passoni BB; Center for Research on Dental Implants (CEPID), Post-Graduation Program in Dentistry (PPGO), School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil., Benfatti CA; Center for Research on Dental Implants (CEPID), Post-Graduation Program in Dentistry (PPGO), School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil., Magini RS; Center for Research on Dental Implants (CEPID), Post-Graduation Program in Dentistry (PPGO), School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil. |
| Abstrakt: |
The aim of this study was to evaluate the density and the morphological aspects of biofilms adhered to different materials applied in oral rehabilitation supported by dental implants. Sixty samples were divided into four groups: feldspar-based porcelain, CoCr alloy, commercially pure titanium grade IV and yttria-stabilized zirconia. Human saliva was diluted into BHI supplemented with sucrose to grow biofilms for 24 or 48 h. After this period, biofilm was removed by 1% protease treatment and then analyzed by spectrophotometry (absorbance), colony forming unit method (CFU.cm-2) and field-emission guns scanning electron microscopy (FEG-SEM). The highest values of absorbance and CFU.cm-2 were recorded on biofilms grown on CoCr alloys when compared to the other test materials for 24 or 48 h. Also, FEG-SEM images showed a high biofilm density on CoCr. There were no significant differences in absorbance and CFU.cm-2 between biofilms grown on zirconia, porcelain and titanium (p<0.05). Microbiological assays associated with microscopic analyses detected a higher accumulation of oral biofilms on CoCr-based materials than that on titanium or zirconia that are used for prosthetic structures. |
