Academic Productivity of Interventional Pulmonology Training Programs.

Autor:	Semaan RW; 1 Section of Interventional Pulmonology, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and., Hazbon MP; 1 Section of Interventional Pulmonology, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and., Arias SA; 2 Section of Interventional Pulmonology, Division of Pulmonary Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida., Lerner AD; 1 Section of Interventional Pulmonology, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and., Yarmus LB; 1 Section of Interventional Pulmonology, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and., Feller-Kopman DJ; 1 Section of Interventional Pulmonology, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and., Lee HJ; 1 Section of Interventional Pulmonology, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Annals of the American Thoracic Society [Ann Am Thorac Soc] 2016 Apr; Vol. 13 (4), pp. 536-9.
DOI:	10.1513/AnnalsATS.201510-704OC
Abstrakt:	Rationale: The Hirsch index (h-index) has been validated as a measure of academic productivity and may be an appropriate tool to assess the scholarly activity of interventional pulmonology (IP). Objectives: This study aimed to elucidate the factors associated with increasing h-index scores among IP training programs. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted of IP training programs across the United States and Canada. Data, including their respective h-index, number of publications, academic rank, geographic location, and possession of an advanced degree, were collected on IP faculty and fellows from 23 teaching institutions. Measurements and Main Results: Ninety-three IP physicians (48 faculty, 45 fellows) in all were included in the study from 23 institutions with a total of 101 data points. The faculty h-index mean was 3.88. The proportion of faculty with an h-index greater than the mean value was increased significantly with higher academic rank (P < 0.0001). In addition, physicians holding an advanced degree beyond an M.D./D.O. had a significantly higher h-index than did those without (P = 0.0062). Conclusions: For academic interventional pulmonologists, the h-index rises with increasing academic rank and possession of an advanced degree. The h-index for IP is roughly comparable to that for other surgical and procedural-based specialties.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu