Placental Size Is Associated Differentially With Postnatal Bone Size and Density.

Autor: Holroyd CR; MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK., Osmond C; MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK., Barker DJ; MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK., Ring SM; MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.; School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK., Lawlor DA; MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.; School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK., Tobias JH; Academic Rheumatology, Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Avon Orthopaedic Centre, Bristol, UK., Smith GD; MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.; School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK., Cooper C; MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. cc@mrc.soton.ac.uk.; NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK. cc@mrc.soton.ac.uk.; NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Headington, Oxford, UK. cc@mrc.soton.ac.uk., Harvey NC; MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.; NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research [J Bone Miner Res] 2016 Oct; Vol. 31 (10), pp. 1855-1864. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Apr 22.
DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.2840
Abstrakt: We investigated relationships between placental size and offspring adolescent bone indices using a population-based, mother-offspring cohort. The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) recruited pregnant women from the southwest of England between 1991 and 1993. There were 12,942 singleton babies born at term who survived at least the first 12 months. From these, 8933 placentas were preserved in formaldehyde, with maternal permission for their use in research studies. At the approximate age of 15.5 years, the children underwent a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan (measurements taken of the whole body minus head bone area [BA], bone mineral content [BMC], and areal bone mineral density [aBMD]). A peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) scan (Stratec XCT2000L; Stratec, Pforzheim, Germany) at the 50% tibial site was performed at this visit and at approximately age 17.7 years. In 2010 a sample of 1680 placentas were measured and photographed. To enable comparison of effect size across different variables, predictor and outcome variables were standardized to Z-scores and therefore results may be interpreted as partial correlation coefficients. Complete placental, DXA, and pQCT data were available for 518 children at age 15.5 years. After adjustment for gender, gestational age at birth, and age at time of pQCT, the placental area was positively associated with endosteal circumference (β [95% CI]: 0.21 [0.13, 0.30], p < 0.001), periosteal circumference (β [95% CI]: 0.19 [0.10, 0.27], p < 0.001), and cortical area (β [95% CI]: 0.10 [0.01, 0.18], p = 0.03), and was negatively associated with cortical density (β [95% CI]: -0.11 [-0.20, -0.03], p = 0.01) at age 15.5 years. Similar relationships were observed for placental volume, and after adjustment for additional maternal and offspring covariates. These results suggest that previously observed associations between placental size and offspring bone development persist into older childhood, even during puberty, and that placental size is differentially related to bone size and volumetric density. © 2016 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).
Competing Interests: All authors report no conflict of interest
(© 2016 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).)
Databáze: MEDLINE