| Autor: |
De Rubeis J; Eos-Klinik für Psychotherapie, Alexianer GmbH, Münster, Germany.; Institute for Health and Behaviour, Research Unit INSIDE, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg., Sütterlin S; Department of Psychology, Lillehammer University College, Lillehammer, Norway.; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Division of Surgery and Clinical Neuroscience, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Norway., Lange D; Eos-Klinik für Psychotherapie, Alexianer GmbH, Münster, Germany., Pawelzik M; Eos-Klinik für Psychotherapie, Alexianer GmbH, Münster, Germany., van Randenborgh A; University of Applied Sciences Münster, Münster, Germany., Victor D; Eos-Klinik für Psychotherapie, Alexianer GmbH, Münster, Germany., Vögele C; Institute for Health and Behaviour, Research Unit INSIDE, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.; Research Group on Health Psychology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. |
| Abstrakt: |
Depression is assumed to be both a risk factor for rejection and a result of it, and as such constitutes an important factor in rejection research. Attachment theory has been applied to understand psychological disorders, such as depression, and can explain individual differences in responses to rejection. Research on autonomic nervous system activity to rejection experiences has been contradictory, with opposing strings of argumentation (activating vs. numbing). We investigated autonomic nervous system-mediated peripheral physiological responses (heart rate) to experimentally manipulated ostracism (Cyberball) in 97 depressed patients with organized (n = 52) and disorganized attachment status (n = 45). Controlling for baseline mean heart rate levels, depressed patients with disorganized attachment status responded to ostracism with significantly higher increases in heart rate than depressed patients with organized attachment status (p = .029; ηp2 = .051). These results suggest that attachment status may be a useful indicator of autonomic responses to perceived social threat, which in turn may affect the therapeutic process and the patient-therapist relationship. |
