Interrater Reliability of the Power Mobility Road Test in the Virtual Reality-Based Simulator-2.

Autor:	Kamaraj DC; Center of Excellence in Wheelchairs and Related Technology, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Human Engineering Research Laboratories, Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Rehabilitation Science and Technology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA., Dicianno BE; Center of Excellence in Wheelchairs and Related Technology, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Human Engineering Research Laboratories, Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. Electronic address: dicianno@pitt.edu., Mahajan HP; Center of Excellence in Wheelchairs and Related Technology, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Human Engineering Research Laboratories, Pittsburgh, PA., Buhari AM; Center of Excellence in Wheelchairs and Related Technology, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Human Engineering Research Laboratories, Pittsburgh, PA., Cooper RA; Center of Excellence in Wheelchairs and Related Technology, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Human Engineering Research Laboratories, Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Rehabilitation Science and Technology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation [Arch Phys Med Rehabil] 2016 Jul; Vol. 97 (7), pp. 1078-84. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Feb 26.
DOI:	10.1016/j.apmr.2016.02.005
Abstrakt:	Objective: To assess interrater reliability of the Power Mobility Road Test (PMRT) when administered through the Virtual Reality-based SIMulator-version 2 (VRSIM-2). Design: Within-subjects repeated-measures design. Setting: Participants interacted with VRSIM-2 through 2 display options (desktop monitor vs immersive virtual reality screens) using 2 control interfaces (roller system vs conventional movement-sensing joystick), providing 4 different driving scenarios (driving conditions 1-4). Participants performed 3 virtual driving sessions for each of the 2 display screens and 1 session through a real-world driving course (driving condition 5). The virtual PMRT was conducted in a simulated indoor office space, and an equivalent course was charted in an open space for the real-world assessment. After every change in driving condition, participants completed a self-reported workload assessment questionnaire, the Task Load Index, developed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Participants: A convenience sample of electric-powered wheelchair (EPW) athletes (N=21) recruited at the 31st National Veterans Wheelchair Games. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Total composite PMRT score. Results: The PMRT had high interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]>.75) between the 2 raters in all 5 driving conditions. Post hoc analyses revealed that the reliability analyses had >80% power to detect high ICCs in driving conditions 1 and 4. Conclusions: The PMRT has high interrater reliability in conditions 1 and 4 and could be used to assess EPW driving performance virtually in VRSIM-2. However, further psychometric assessment is necessary to assess the feasibility of administering the PMRT using the different interfaces of VRSIM-2. (Copyright © 2016 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu