Outcome of Lateral Transfer of the FHL or FDL for Concomitant Peroneal Tendon Tears.

Autor:	Seybold JD; Twin Cities Orthopedics, Edina, MN, USA jseybold@tcomn.com., Campbell JT; Institute for Foot and Ankle Reconstruction, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA., Jeng CL; Institute for Foot and Ankle Reconstruction, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA., Short KW; Institute for Foot and Ankle Reconstruction, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA., Myerson MS; Institute for Foot and Ankle Reconstruction, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Foot & ankle international [Foot Ankle Int] 2016 Jun; Vol. 37 (6), pp. 576-81. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Feb 24.
DOI:	10.1177/1071100716634762
Abstrakt:	Background: Concomitant tears of the peroneus longus and brevis tendons are rare injuries, with literature limited to case reports and small patient series. Only 1 recent study directly compared the results of single-stage lateral deep flexor transfer, and no previous series objectively evaluated power and balance following transfer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and objective power and balance data following single-stage flexor hallucis longus (FHL) and flexor digitorum longus (FDL) tendon transfers for treatment of concomitant peroneus longus and brevis tears. Methods: Over an 8-year period (2005-2012), 9 patients underwent lateral transfer of the FHL or FDL tendon for treatment of concomitant peroneus longus and brevis tears. All but 1 patient underwent additional procedures to address hindfoot malalignment or other contributing deformity at the time of surgery. Mean age was 56.9 years, and average body mass index was 27.9. Lateral transfer of the FHL was performed in 5 patients, and FDL transfer performed in 4 with mean follow-up 35.7 months (range: 11-94). Eight of 9 patients completed SF-12 and Foot Function Index (FFI) scores, and 7 returned for range of motion (ROM) and manual strength testing of the involved and normal extremities. These 7 patients also completed force plate balance tests, in addition to peak force and power testing on a PrimusRS machine with a certified physical therapist. Results: All patients were satisfied with the results of the procedure. Mean SF-12 physical and mental scores were 32 and 55, respectively; mean FFI total score was 56.7. No postoperative infections were noted. Two patients continued to utilize orthotics or braces, and 2 patients reported occasional pain with weightbearing activity. Three patients noted mild paresthesias in the distribution of the sural nerve and 2 demonstrated tibial neuritis. All patients demonstrated 4/5 eversion strength in the involved extremity. Average loss of inversion and eversion ROM were 24.7% and 27.2% of normal, respectively. Mean postoperative eversion peak force and power were decreased greater than 55% relative to the normal extremity. Patients demonstrated nearly 50% increases in both center-of-pressure tracing length and velocity during balance testing. There were no statistically significant differences between the FHL and FDL transfer groups with regards to clinical examination or objective power and balance tests. Conclusion: The FHL and FDL tendons were both successful options for lateral transfer in cases of concomitant peroneus longus and brevis tears. Objective measurements of strength and balance demonstrated significant deficits in the operative extremity, even years following the procedure. These differences, however, did not appear to alter or inhibit patient activity levels or high satisfaction rates with the procedure. Although anatomic studies have demonstrated benefits of FHL transfer over the FDL tendon, further studies with increased patient numbers are needed to determine if these differences are clinically significant. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series. (© The Author(s) 2016.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu