Oral distension methods for small bowel MRI: comparison of different agents to optimize bowel distension.

Autor:	Schmidt SA; 1 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany., Baumann JA; 1 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany., Stanescu-Siegmund N; 1 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany., Froehlich E; 2 Department of Internal Medicine, Karl-Olga Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany., Brambs HJ; 1 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany., Juchems MS; 3 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Konstanz Hospital, Konstanz, Germany.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987) [Acta Radiol] 2016 Dec; Vol. 57 (12), pp. 1460-1467. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Jul 20.
DOI:	10.1177/0284185116631183
Abstrakt:	Background Different methods for bowel distension prior to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations were described in recent years. Purpose To compare orally administered psyllium or locust bean gum / mannitol (LBM) with tylose administered through a duodenal catheter for bowel distension in patients undergoing MRI examination of the small bowel. Material and Methods Three different methods of bowel distension prior to MRI were compared: tylose applied through a duodenal catheter and orally administered psyllium and LBM in three groups with 15 patients each. Datasets were blinded and reviewed independently by two experienced radiologists, who assessed the diagnostic value and the maximum luminal diameter. Results Tylose was superior to psyllium and LBM in the examination of the duodenum and proximal jejunum. LBM was superior to the other methods for distension of the ileum and terminal ileum. The greatest luminal diameter of the duodenum was achieved after tylose and distension of the terminal ileum was the best in patients receiving LBM. The psyllium group was inferior to the other two groups in all segments. Conclusion By using LBM as an oral method of bowel distension, many patients can avoid the unpleasant placement of a duodenal catheter without compromising the diagnostic value of the examination.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu