Brief Tailored Smoking Cessation Counseling in a Lung Cancer Screening Population is Feasible: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Autor:	Marshall HM; University of Queensland Thoracic Research Centre, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia Henry.marshall@health.qld.gov.au., Courtney DA; University of Queensland Thoracic Research Centre, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia., Passmore LH; University of Queensland Thoracic Research Centre, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia., McCaul EM; University of Queensland Thoracic Research Centre, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia., Yang IA; University of Queensland Thoracic Research Centre, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia., Bowman RV; University of Queensland Thoracic Research Centre, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia., Fong KM; University of Queensland Thoracic Research Centre, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco [Nicotine Tob Res] 2016 Jul; Vol. 18 (7), pp. 1665-9. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Feb 01.
DOI:	10.1093/ntr/ntw010
Abstrakt:	Introduction: Maximizing smoking abstinence in lung cancer screening participants is important to reduce individual risk of disease and improve screening cost-effectiveness; however, the optimal strategy remains undefined. We hypothesized that a single session of tailored face-to-face counseling on the day of screening CT scan, coupled with audio and printed cessation information would be feasible to deliver in a CT screening trial. Methods: We randomized volunteer smokers in the Queensland Lung Cancer Screening Study to intervention (counseling session, audio quit materials, printed quit materials, Quitline contact details) or control group (printed quit materials, Quitline contact details). Participants self-reported point prevalence quit rates at 1 year. Results: Fifty-five smokers were enrolled; 28 randomized to intervention and 27 controls. Median cigarette consumption was 25/day; 54/55 smoked at least 15 cigarettes per day. Median smoking duration was 46 years. Median Fagerström dependence score was 6. In total 58% did not report any quit attempt in the prior 12 months. Mean duration of counseling was 26.5 minutes. After 1 year, four participants (14.3%) in the intervention group and five participants (18.5%) in the control group had quit (P = .74). Combined annual point prevalence quit rate was 16.4%. Conclusions: Although feasible to deliver a single session of tailored counseling on the day of screening this intervention had no discernible impact on cessation over and above printed materials and Quitline access. As participants exhibited hardcore smoking characteristics, more intensive strategies, in larger cohorts, should be explored. Implications: The optimal smoking cessation strategy within a lung cancer screening program is not known. This study demonstrates that a single session of counseling can be feasibly delivered on the day of screening but may not have been intensive enough for long-term, hard-core smokers. (© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu