[Computerized ranking test in three French universities: Staff experience and students' feedback].

Autor: Roux D; Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 75205 Paris, France; Service de réanimation médicochirurgicale, hôpital Louis-Mourier, AP-HP, 178, rue des Renouillers, 92700 Colombes, France. Electronic address: damien.droux@gmail.com., Meyer G; Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 75006 Paris, France; Service de pneumologie, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, AP-HP, 75015 Paris, France., Cymbalista F; Université Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 93000 Bobigny, France; Service d'hématologie biologique, hôpital Avicenne, AP-HP, 93000 Bobigny, France., Bouaziz JD; Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 75205 Paris, France; Service de dermatologie, hôpital Saint-Louis, AP-HP, 75010 Paris, France., Falgarone G; Université Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 93000 Bobigny, France; Service de rhumatologie, hôpital Avicenne, AP-HP, 93000 Bobigny, France., Tesniere A; Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 75006 Paris, France; Service de réanimation chirurgicale, hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, 74014 Paris, France., Gervais J; Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 75205 Paris, France., Cariou A; Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 75006 Paris, France; Service de réanimation médicale, hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, 74014 Paris, France., Peffault de Latour R; Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 75205 Paris, France; Service d'hématologie greffe, hôpital Saint-Louis, AP-HP, 75010 Paris, France., Marat M; Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 75006 Paris, France., Moenaert E; Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 75205 Paris, France., Guebli T; Université Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 93000 Bobigny, France., Rodriguez O; Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 75006 Paris, France., Lefort A; Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 75205 Paris, France; Service de médecine interne, hôpital Beaujon, AP-HP, 92110 Clichy, France., Dreyfuss D; Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 75205 Paris, France; Service de réanimation médicochirurgicale, hôpital Louis-Mourier, AP-HP, 178, rue des Renouillers, 92700 Colombes, France., Hajage D; Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 75205 Paris, France; Département d'épidémiologie et de recherche clinique, hôpital Louis-Mourier, AP-HP, 92700 Colombes, France., Ricard JD; Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 75205 Paris, France; Service de réanimation médicochirurgicale, hôpital Louis-Mourier, AP-HP, 178, rue des Renouillers, 92700 Colombes, France.
Jazyk: francouzština
Zdroj: La Revue de medecine interne [Rev Med Interne] 2016 Mar; Vol. 37 (3), pp. 166-72. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Jan 27.
DOI: 10.1016/j.revmed.2015.12.026
Abstrakt: Background: The year 2016 will be pivotal for the evaluation of French medical students with the introduction of the first computerized National Ranking Test (ECNi). The SIDES, online electronic system for medical student evaluation, was created for this purpose. All the universities have already organized faculty exams but few a joint computerized ranking test at several universities simultaneously. We report our experience on the organization of a mock ECNi by universities Paris Descartes, Paris Diderot and Paris 13.
Methods: Docimological, administrative and technical working groups were created to organize this ECNi. Students in their fifth year of medical studies, who will be the first students to sit for the official ECNi in 2016, were invited to attend this mock exam that represented more than 50% of what will be proposed in 2016. A final electronic questionnaire allowed a docimological and organizational evaluation by students. An analysis of ratings and rankings and their distribution on a 1000-point scale were performed.
Results: Sixty-four percent of enrolled students (i.e., 654) attended the three half-day exams. No difference in total score and ranking between the three universities was observed. Students' feedback was extremely positive. Normalized over 1000 points, 99% of students were scored on 300 points only. Progressive clinical cases were the most discriminating test.
Conclusion: The organization of a mock ECNi involving multiple universities was a docimological and technical success but required an important administrative, technical and teaching investment.
(Copyright © 2016 Société nationale française de médecine interne (SNFMI). Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: