Comparison of hypoxia-activated prodrug evofosfamide (TH-302) and ifosfamide in preclinical non-small cell lung cancer models.

Autor: Sun JD; a Threshold Pharmaceuticals , South San Francisco , CA , USA., Liu Q; a Threshold Pharmaceuticals , South San Francisco , CA , USA., Ahluwalia D; a Threshold Pharmaceuticals , South San Francisco , CA , USA., Ferraro DJ; a Threshold Pharmaceuticals , South San Francisco , CA , USA., Wang Y; a Threshold Pharmaceuticals , South San Francisco , CA , USA., Jung D; a Threshold Pharmaceuticals , South San Francisco , CA , USA., Matteucci MD; a Threshold Pharmaceuticals , South San Francisco , CA , USA., Hart CP; a Threshold Pharmaceuticals , South San Francisco , CA , USA.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Cancer biology & therapy [Cancer Biol Ther] 2016 Apr 02; Vol. 17 (4), pp. 371-80. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Jan 28.
DOI: 10.1080/15384047.2016.1139268
Abstrakt: Evofosfamide (TH-302) is a hypoxia-activated prodrug of the cytotoxin bromo-isophosphoramide. In hypoxic conditions Br-IPM is released and alkylates DNA. Ifosfamide is a chloro-isophosphoramide prodrug activated by hepatic Cytochrome P450 enzymes. Both compounds are used for the treatment of cancer. Ifosfamide has been approved by the FDA while evofosfamide is currently in the late stage of clinical development. The purpose of this study is to compare efficacy and safety profile of evofosfamide and ifosfamide in preclinical non-small cell lung cancer H460 xenograft models. Immunocompetent CD-1 mice and H460 tumor-bearing immunocompromised nude mice were used to investigate the safety profile. The efficacy of evofosfamide or ifosfamide, alone, and in combination with docetaxel or sunitinib was compared in ectopic and intrapleural othortopic H460 xenograft models in animals exposed to ambient air or different oxygen concentration breathing conditions. At an equal body weight loss level, evofosfamide showed greater or comparable efficacy in both ectopic and orthotopic H460 xenograft models. Evofosfamide, but not ifosfamide, exhibited controlled oxygen concentration breathing condition-dependent antitumor activity. However, at an equal body weight loss level, ifosfamide yielded severe hematologic toxicity when compared to evofosfamide, both in monotherapy and in combination with docetaxel. At an equal hematoxicity level, evofosfamide showed superior antitumor activity. These results indicate that evofosfamide shows superior or comparable efficacy and a favorable safety profile when compared to ifosfamide in preclinical human lung carcinoma models. This finding is consistent with multiple clinical trials of evofosfamide as a single agent, or in combination therapy, which demonstrated both anti-tumor activity and safety profile without severe myelosuppression.
Databáze: MEDLINE