Registered Replication Report: Hart & Albarracín (2011).
| Autor: | Eerland A; Anita Eerland, Trans 10, 3512JK, Utrecht, Netherlands, E-mail: a.eerland@uu.nl, Sherrill AM; Northern Illinois University, Magliano JP; Northern Illinois University, Zwaan RA; Erasmus University Rotterdam, Arnal JD; McDaniel College, Aucoin PA; Mount Saint Vincent University, Berger SA; College of Mount Saint Vincent, Birt AR; Mount Saint Vincent University, Capezza N; Stonehill College, Carlucci M; Loyola University Maryland, Crocker C; Stonehill College, Ferretti TR; Wilfrid Laurier University, Kibbe MR; Grand Valley State University, Knepp MM; University of Mount Union, Kurby CA; Grand Valley State University, Melcher JM; St. Cloud State University, Michael SW; Mercer University, Poirier C; Stonehill College, Prenoveau JM; Loyola University Maryland |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science [Perspect Psychol Sci] 2016 Jan; Vol. 11 (1), pp. 158-71. |
| DOI: | 10.1177/1745691615605826 |
| Abstrakt: | Language can be viewed as a complex set of cues that shape people's mental representations of situations. For example, people think of behavior described using imperfective aspect (i.e., what a person was doing) as a dynamic, unfolding sequence of actions, whereas the same behavior described using perfective aspect (i.e., what a person did) is perceived as a completed whole. A recent study found that aspect can also influence how we think about a person's intentions (Hart & Albarracín, 2011). Participants judged actions described in imperfective as being more intentional (d between 0.67 and 0.77) and they imagined these actions in more detail (d = 0.73). The fact that this finding has implications for legal decision making, coupled with the absence of other direct replication attempts, motivated this registered replication report (RRR). Multiple laboratories carried out 12 direct replication studies, including one MTurk study. A meta-analysis of these studies provides a precise estimate of the size of this effect free from publication bias. This RRR did not find that grammatical aspect affects intentionality (d between 0 and -0.24) or imagery (d = -0.08). We discuss possible explanations for the discrepancy between these results and those of the original study. (© The Author(s) 2015.) |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|