Is Subtalar Joint Cartilage Resection Necessary for Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis via Intramedullary Nail? A Multicenter Evaluation.

Autor: Mulhern JL; Associate Physician, Martin Foot and Ankle, York, PA., Protzman NM; Research Associate, Coordinated Health, Allentown, PA., Levene MJ; Fellow, Foot & Ankle Reconstruction, Aria 3B Orthopaedic Specialists Philadelphia, PA., Martin SM; Resident, Carilion Clinic, Roanoke, VA., Fleming JJ; Fellowship Director, Foot & Ankle Reconstruction, Aria 3B Orthopaedic Specialists, Philadelphia, PA., Clements JR; Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA; Co-Section Chief, Foot and Ankle, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Carillion Clinic, Roanoke, VA., Brigido SA; Fellowship Director, Foot & Ankle Reconstruction, and Department Chair, Foot and Ankle Department, Coordinated Health, Bethlehem, PA; Clinical Professor of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Department, The Commonwealth Medical College, Scranton, PA. Electronic address: drsbrigido@mac.com.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons [J Foot Ankle Surg] 2016 May-Jun; Vol. 55 (3), pp. 572-7. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Jan 23.
DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2015.11.007
Abstrakt: Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with intramedullary nailing is traditionally performed with formal preparation of both the subtalar and ankle joints. However, we believe that subtalar joint preparation is not necessary to achieve satisfactory outcomes in patients undergoing tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a retrograde intramedullary nail. The primary aim of the present retrospective study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients who had undergone tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with an intramedullary nail without formal subtalar joint cartilage resection. A multicenter medical record review was performed to identify consecutive patients. Pain was assessed using a visual analog scale, and osseous union at the tibiotalar joint was defined as bony trabeculation across the arthrodesis site on all 3 radiographic views. Progression of joint deterioration was evaluated across time at the subtalar joint, using a modified grading system developed by Takakura et al. Forty consecutive patients (aged 61.9 ± 12.9 years; 17 men) met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Compared with the pain reported preoperatively (6.4 ± 2.7), a statistically significant decline was seen in the pain experienced after surgery (1.2 ± 1.8; p < .001). The mean time to consolidated arthrodesis at the ankle joint was 3.8 ± 1.5 months. A statistically significant increase in deterioration at the subtalar joint was observed across time [t(36) = -6.200, p < .001]. Compared with previously published data of subtalar joint cartilage resection, the present study has demonstrated a similar decline in pain, with a high rate of union, and also a decrease in operative time when preparation of the subtalar joint was not performed.
(Copyright © 2016 American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: