| Autor: |
Hemmes B; Network Acute Care Limburg, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands. baukjehemmes@hotmail.com., Jeukens CR; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands., Kemerink GJ; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands., Brink PR; Network Acute Care Limburg, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.; Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands., Poeze M; Network Acute Care Limburg, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.; Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.; NUTRIM, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. |
| Abstrakt: |
Trauma patients at risk for, or suspected of, spinal injury are frequently transported to hospital using full spinal immobilisation. At the emergency department, immobilisation is often maintained until radiological work-up is completed. In this study, we examined how these devices influence radiation exposure and noise, as a proxy for objective image quality. Conventional radiographs (CR) and computer tomography (CT) scans were made using a phantom immobilised on two types of spineboard and a vacuum mattress and using two types of headblocks. Images were compared for radiation transmission and quantitative image noise. In CR, up to 23 % and, in CT, up to 11 % of radiation were blocked by the devices. Without compensation for the decreased transmission, noise increased by up to 16 % in CT, depending on the device used. Removing the headblocks led to a statistically significant improvement in transmission with automatic exposure control (AEC) enabled. Physicians should make an informed decision whether the increased radiation exposure outweighs the risk of missing a clinically significant injury by not making a CR or CT scan. Manufacturers of immobilisation devices should take radiological properties of their devices into account in the development and production process. |
Full text from SpringerLink