| Autor: |
Akram W; Clinical BioPharmaceutics Research Group (CBRG), Inhalational Delivery Research Unit (IDRU) and Biomedical Analysis Lab (BAL), Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam Campus, 42300 Bandar Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia., Hussein MS; Clinical BioPharmaceutics Research Group (CBRG), Inhalational Delivery Research Unit (IDRU) and Biomedical Analysis Lab (BAL), Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam Campus, 42300 Bandar Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia., Ahmad S; Clinical BioPharmaceutics Research Group (CBRG), Inhalational Delivery Research Unit (IDRU) and Biomedical Analysis Lab (BAL), Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam Campus, 42300 Bandar Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia., Mamat MN; i-Learn Centre, Academic Affairs Division, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40000 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia., Ismail NE; Clinical BioPharmaceutics Research Group (CBRG), Inhalational Delivery Research Unit (IDRU) and Biomedical Analysis Lab (BAL), Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam Campus, 42300 Bandar Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia. |
| Abstrakt: |
There is no instrument which collectively assesses the knowledge, attitude and perceived practice of asthma among community pharmacists. Therefore, this study aimed to validate the instrument which measured the knowledge, attitude and perceived practice of asthma among community pharmacists by producing empirical evidence of validity and reliability of the items using Rasch model (Bond & Fox software®) for dichotomous and polytomous data. This baseline study recruited 33 community pharmacists from Penang, Malaysia. The results showed that all PTMEA Corr were in positive values, where an item was able to distinguish between the ability of respondents. Based on the MNSQ infit and outfit range (0.60-1.40), out of 55 items, 2 items from the instrument were suggested to be removed. The findings indicated that the instrument fitted with Rasch measurement model and showed the acceptable reliability values of 0.88 and 0.83 and 0.79 for knowledge, attitude and perceived practice respectively. |
